Anonymous ID: 62f67b June 5, 2020, 7:04 p.m. No.9495235   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5274 >>5279 >>5575 >>5636 >>5793 >>5818

>They are fighting hard for the Radical Left Democrats. A one sided battle. Illegal.Section 230!

 

2653

The History of Ruth Bader Ginsburg; Appointed by Bill Clinton

Q

!!mG7VJxZNCI

6 Jan 2019 - 9:32:35 AM

[RBG]

Why was she 'selected'?

Who appointed her?

Remember [her] history.

Ref:230-page book called Sex Bias in the U.S. Code, published in 1977 by the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights.

Highlights:

>Called for the sex-integration of prisons and reformatories so that conditions of imprisonment, security and housing could be equal. She explained, “If the grand design of such institutions is to prepare inmates for return to the community as persons equipped to benefit from and contribute to civil society, then perpetuation of single-sex institutions should be rejected.” (Page 101)

>Called for the sex-integration of Boy Scouts and Girl Scouts because they “perpetuate stereotyped sex roles.” (Page 145)

>Insisted on sex-integrating “college fraternity and sorority chapters” and replacing them with “college social societies.” (Page 169)

>Cast constitutional doubt on the legality of “Mother’s Day and Father’s Day as separate holidays.” (Page 146)

>Called for reducing the age of consent for sexual acts to people who are “less than 12 years old.” (Page 102)

>Asserted that laws against “bigamists, persons cohabiting with more than one woman, and women cohabiting with a bigamist” are unconstitutional. (Page 195)

>Objected to laws against prostitution because “prostitution, as a consensual act between adults, is arguably within the zone of privacy protected by recent constitutional decisions.” (Page 97)

>Ginsburg wrote that the Mann Act (which punishes those who engage in interstate sex traffic of women and girls) is “offensive.” Such acts should be considered “within the zone of privacy.” (Page 98)

>Demanded that we “firmly reject draft or combat exemption for women,” stating “women must be subject to the draft if men are.” But, she added, “the need for affirmative action and for transition measures is particularly strong in the uniformed services.” (Page 218)

>An indefatigable censor, Ginsburg listed hundreds of “sexist” words that must be eliminated from all statutes. Among words she found offensive were: man, woman, manmade, mankind, husband, wife, mother, father, sister, brother, son, daughter, serviceman, longshoreman, postmaster, watchman, seamanship, and “to man” (a vessel). (Pages 15-16)

>Wanted he, she, him, her, his, and hers to be dropped down the memory hole. They must be replaced by he/she, her/him, and hers/his, and federal statutes must use the bad grammar of “plural constructions to avoid third person singular pronouns.” (Page 52-53)

>Condemned the Supreme Court’s ruling in Harris v. McRae and claimed that taxpayer-funded abortions should be a constitutional right.

http://humanevents.com/2005/08/23/senators-overlooked-radical-record-of-ruth-bader-ginsburg/📁

Who are the doctors 'currently' treating [RBG]?

What other political [former/current] sr. political heads are they affiliated w/?

What 'off-market' drugs are being provided to [RBG] in order to sustain minimum daily function?

What is the real medical diagnosis of [RBG]?

Who is managing her care?

Who is 'really' managing her care?

>The clock is ticking.

PANIC IN DC.

Q

Anonymous ID: 62f67b June 5, 2020, 7:21 p.m. No.9495555   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5578 >>5593 >>5636

>>9495537 “We will vanquish the virus, we will get our nation back to work, and we shall build our glorious future with American hands, American grit, and American pride.”

 

>https://twitter.com/WhiteHouse/status/1269078363668430848

 

>NEW WH

 

notable

Anonymous ID: 62f67b June 5, 2020, 7:27 p.m. No.9495655   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>9495604

>Facts have been "no barrier" to the mainstream media's planned narrative about the unrest around America, Mollie Hemingway writes.

>

>https://twitter.com/WhiteHouse/status/1269087110071451648

>

>NEW WH

 

notable

Anonymous ID: 62f67b June 5, 2020, 7:31 p.m. No.9495720   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5793 >>5818

>>9495665

>>9495505

>

>After Grenell stuck SwallowsWell's dick in Eric's own mouth MULTIPLE times…SwallowsWell just keep coming back for more! lmao

 

Richard Grenell

@RichardGrenell

No - because once again you push fake news. See the official statement here:

https://www.nps.gov/subjects/uspp/6_5_20_statement_from_acting_chief_monahan.htm

Quote Tweet

Rep. Eric Swalwell

@RepSwalwell

· 1h

Hey @RichardGrenell, would you like to walk back your “no tear gas was used” propaganda? cc: @RyanLizza twitter.com/john_hudson/st…

7:17 PM · Jun 5, 2020

 

News Release

June 5 Statement from United States Park Police acting Chief Gregory T. Monahan about the actions taken over the weekend to protect life and property

 

Date: June 5, 2020

Contact: uspp_pio@nps.gov

 

Reiterating his previous statement regarding the actions taken over the weekend to protect life and property at Lafayette Park, the United States Park Police acting Chief Gregory T. Monahan issued the following statement today:

 

WASHINGTON – United States Park Police officers and other assisting law enforcement partners did not use tear gas or OC Skat Shells to close the area at Lafayette Park in response to violent protestors.

 

notable