Anonymous ID: 2b5aa7 June 5, 2020, 8:03 p.m. No.9496133   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>9496001 no.

 

U.S. Patent No. 6,506,148 (inventor Hendricus Loos), Jan, 14, 2003

NERVOUS SYSTEM MANIPULATION BY ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS FROM MONITORS

 

illustrates the technical feasibility of deliberately manipulating humans by pulsed frequency emissions from CRT or LCD monitors (i.e. televisions, computer screens, any device with a display).

 

"ABSTRACT

"Physiological effects have been observed in a human subject

in response to stimulation of the skin with weak electro

magnetic fields that are pulsed with certain frequencies near

1/2 Hz or 2.4 Hz, such as to excite a sensory resonance. Many

computer monitors and TV tubes, when displaying pulsed

images, emit pulsed electromagnetic fields of sufficient

amplitudes to cause such excitation. It is therefore possible

to manipulate the nervous system of a subject by pulsing

images displayed on a nearby computer monitor or TV set.

For the latter, the image pulsing may be imbedded in the

program material, or it may be overlaid by modulating a

video stream, either as an RF signal or as a video signal. The

image displayed on a computer monitor may be pulsed

effectively by a simple computer program. For certain

monitors, pulsed electromagnetic fields capable of exciting

sensory resonances in nearby subjects may be generated

even as the displayed images are pulsed with subliminal

intensity."

 

Got it? Even people in the vicinity of the monitor can be affected by low-intensity (i.e unnoticeable) pulsing.

 

What kinds of effects?

At 1/2 Hz, "the observed effects include ptosis of the eyelids, relaxation,

drowziness, the feeling of pressure at a centered spot on the

lower edge of the brow, seeing moving patterns of dark

purple and greenish yellow with the eyes closed, a tonic

smile, a tense feeling in the stomach, sudden loose stool, and

sexual excitement, depending on the precise frequency usedโ€ฆ"

 

Not just in this patent. The prior art describes the same effects elicited by pulsed electric fields, pulsed magnetic fields, weak heat pulses applied to the skin, and subliminal acoustic pulses.

 

The effects produced at the 2.4 Hz frequency include slowing of certain cortical processes.

 

How do these pulses get to the brain to cause such effects? Sensory nerves fire spontaneously. Weak pulses applied to the skin cause slight frequency modulation patterns in these nerves' firings. Even very weak electric fields cause slight polarization changes in the skin. Applying the stimulation over broad areas of the skin such as by an electromagnetic field simultaneously stimulates enough nerves that the individual nerve spikes reaching the brain sum together, causing coherent stimulation of the central nervous system at the induced frequency.

 

"Weak magnetic fields that are pulsed with a sensory

resonance frequency can induce the same physiological

effects as pulsed electric fields. Unlike the latter however,

the magnetic fields penetrate biological tissue with nearly

undiminished strength. Eddy currents in the tissue drive

electric charges to the skin, where the charge distributions

are subject to thermal smearing in much the same way as in

electric field stimulation, so that the same physiological

effects develop."

 

The patent describes introduction of these pulse patterns by a computer program under the subject's control, or inserted into a video stream delivered from a DVD or over the internet or by a television signal. This is just one of a long series of patents dating from 1971 on manipulating the human nervous system.

 

Inventor Loos cautions:

 

"Certain monitors can emit electromagnetic field pulses

that excite a sensory resonance in a nearby subject, through

image pulses that are so weak as to be subliminal. This is

unfortunate since it opens a way for mischievous application

of the invention, whereby people are exposed unknowingly

to manipulation of their nervous systems for someone elseโ€™s

purposes. Such application would be unethical and is of

course not advocated. It is mentioned here in order to alert

the public to the possibility of covert abuse that may occur

while being online, or while watching TV, a video, or a DVD."

 

Who would have a motivation, financial or otherwise, to manipulate people by inserting subliminal magnetic or electric or acoustic pulses into TV content, video games, or internet content?

What if sexual feelings were added to an advertisement?

What if a video game added feelings of excitement?

Or if everybody at a bar caught physiological effects from sports on the big TV?

Can you imagine advertisers, governments, corporations, or cyberwarfare organizations REFRAINING from manipulating us, when virtually the whole world is glued to a display screen all day?

 

What if the same kinds of nervous-system-manipulating frequencies are transmitted from a network of satellites blanketing Earth?

Anonymous ID: 2b5aa7 June 5, 2020, 8:08 p.m. No.9496222   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

notable

 

>>9496175 21 puzzling Questions about the Floyd George Incident

 

Anons this is more than sufficient, if vetted for accuracy and sauce added, to be the basis for writing an article. Maybe half a dozen articles. Lots of good observations to make people question the narrative.