Anonymous ID: 85acc9 June 5, 2020, 9:01 p.m. No.9496954   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7284

>>9496663

>>9496886

 

The Narrative (Part 1)

It has been said that we are in the information age and that information is the new gold. So why is data so valuable? To answer that question let’s first take a look at 3 different movies.

-The Matrix (Series)

-The Adjustment Bureau

-The Imitation Game

The Matrix

What is the Matrix?

According to the movie the Matrix is a system of control. An alternate reality created to distract the minds of all who are connected in order to harvest their energy.

Important Notes:

-As stated in the second movie of the series, one version of the Matrix was a failure. Connected users rejected the reality because it was too perfect.

-The Matrix was not successful until it was capable of accounting for choice.

-While a non-user(someone that has at some point been disconnected from the Matrix and is conscious of what the Matrix is) is interfaced with it(inside the Matrix and interacting with it and those connected to it), any users(those still being harvested for their energy and believing the Matrix to be a true reality), are a direct threat. If at any point, a user witnesses a non-user acting/behaving in a way that goes against the rules set by the Matrix, a response is triggered where a “program”(a seemingly unstoppable agent) overrides the users consciousness and attempts(most often succeeds) to attack and destroy the non-user.

The Adjustment Bureau

What is the Adjustment Bureau?

According to the movie the Adjustment Bureau is an entity whose purpose is to ensure humanity follows a predetermined narrative based on probability. In this movie, agents of the Bureau step in to correct the course of the main character after he encounters a woman. By interacting with this woman he has put the grand narrative at risk and they are forced to take action in order to ensure the narrative comes to fruition.

Important Notes:

-The Bureau acts under the direction of a seemingly supernatural force but does not use supernatural powers to change the course of the people inside the narrative. Instead, it is up to the Bureau to alter/influence events in order to ensure the success of the narrative.

The Imitation Game

What is the Imitation Game?

Well, let’s get to that a little later but the movie is a depiction of how one man(Alan Turing) came up with the idea to create a machine that could decipher any encryption that the Enigma(Encryption tool used by the Axis forces in WWII) was set at and was credited as winning the war for the Allied forces. The Enigma allowed for “159 million million million” possible settings that were changed everyday which made it impossible to decipher on a day by day basis without the aid of a machine.

Important Note:

-There is a point in the movie when the team has cracked the Enigma and have now tracked the location of every single enemy deployment. They even realized that there was about to be an attack on one of the Allied ships. There is some additional drama added due to the ship being the same vessel that one of the team member’s brother is stationed on but an argument ensues as to whether or not they should alert the ship. Alerting the ship could save everyone on it including the brother, but it would also alert the Germans to the possibility that the Enigma had been cracked and undermine all of the progress they had made.

The Narrative (Part 2)

Now that we have looked at the important points of those movies let’s begin analysing how they are all connected.

I’ll begin with The Imitation Game. As mentioned above, there comes a point when the team realizes that what they do with the information they have could win the war, but only if the enemy doesn’t realize that they have it. In the following scene Alan turns to the head of British intelligence for help. He admits to him that they have cracked the Enigma but he now needs the intel agency to use statistical analysis and formulate a plan that would allow them to win the war while keeping the variable rate of change low enough to not alert the enemy. In other words, by having ALL of the information, the intel agency would now be able to guarantee victory regardless of what the enemy did. It would only be a matter of time. And this is what the real Imitation Game was. The intel agency had to come up with a plan that would IMITATE REALITY! And they did! They created situations where the reality that the enemy saw was a lie!

Next we will factor in what we know from The Adjustment Bureau. In that movie, the key players in the narrative were unaware of their roles. But what if they were aware of their roles? What if an entity existed that had ALL of the information and could systematically install people into positions of power in order to ensure the success of a narrative that they had created? By having ALL of the information they could install people into those positions and guarantee it came to fruition….as long as the “enemy” was unaware. The people in those positions of power/influence wouldn’t even need to know the plan. Some of them would need to know at least to some degree, what the plan was but many of them simply need to know that they must do what they are told. They would understand that they are only in that position of power because said agency put them there and if they wanted to stay in that position then they had better do as they were told.

Now let’s look at The Matrix. As mentioned, the Matrix is a lie. It is a false reality. A reality created to ensure that those living it will freely give up their “energy”. So let’s suppose that in our own reality there was an entity that had ALL of the information, had filled the positions of power(politicians/actors/new anchors) like a player positioning his pieces on a chess board, and did it all to ensure a narrative that they had created. Would that be all that different from the Matrix? Could what we see as reality actually be a complete and utter lie? Could it be possible that what we believe to be free will is actually a predetermined fate? Is it so hard to imagine that this could actually be happening?

Do I have your attention yet? If you believe that this couldn’t possibly be happening then let’s look at the important points that I made about The Matrix. Would a perfect world be rejected by the individual? Does pain and suffering create an emotional connection to our reality? More importantly, do we see “agents” of the Matrix? Have any of you interacted with friends or family members who you know to be loving, caring and intelligent people and then all of the sudden you are talking to a “machine”? Did you cause them to question their reality only to have the human individual disappear and have a “program” take their place? If you have not yet realized that humans can be programmed then unfortunately you are undoubtedly a victim of it.

And this is where it starts to get dark, really dark. Have you noticed that movies and television are quite literally called “programming”? Have you noticed what the dominant plots to movies and television have been? Glorifying sin and/or the dark arts? The murder of “Nazis”? Have you noticed the growing racial divide where saying things like “All lives matter” will ruin your life…and even have you labeled as a Nazi? There is something horrible happening in this world and it has not happened organically. It is only the illusion of reality.

The saddest part of it all is summed up in what I said at the beginning of this. THIS is why information is so valuable. And we have simply given it all away.

End Part 2

Part 3 (and my identity[JHS]) coming soon

>>9494975

The Narrative (Part 3)

I hope that everyone was able to follow along with part 1 of what I see as our true reality. Here are some additional points I forgot to add:

-One important thing that I forgot to reiterate about The Imitation Game is that it is at least loosely based on reality. It is a direct admission that intel agencies had the ability to create false realities even then.

-If you haven’t read anything about Ted Kaczynski, I highly suggest that you do. Not saying that I agree with everything that he says but he lays the plot out for all to see. Here is one of his quotes from “Unabomber - In his own words”(Netflix) that really stands out to me:

“Pure mathematics is useless from a practical point of view and that’s what I studied. I mean, a lot of people don’t understand what mathematicians really do, you know? They think they sit there adding up columns of figures or something like that. But that isn’t what it is. It’s more like puzzle solving.” Puzzle solving…building a narrative based on statistical change?

Part 3 is a summation of what I see this all coming to and some evidence as to why.

There is a person/group currently posting online known as Qanon. And this person/group portrays themselves to be part of the U.S. government and that they are trying to save all of humanity from the control of a demonic entity that is currently controlling the narrative. It is not for me to say if they are or are not but they have certainly made a convincing case that they are. What really astounds me and what everyone who believes that they are part of the government seems to have missed is that if it is true, it is a flat out admission that social engineers and everything I have outlined is true. Qanon has been posting since 10/28/2017 and made statement after statement outlining how they are in complete control. (Qanon itself is a whole other discussion that I have ample notes on but won’t get into detail here. I will cite some other examples of statements made by ?it? later on but right now I will only point out the irony that we are now trusting that the government will save us from what the government got us into. I know, I know, it’s the “bad actors” but at least acknowledge it for what it is.)

Anyway, Qanon continues to speak of what it has coined “The Great Awakening”, a point when all of the world will come to realize what has been happening. And this is very interesting because it reminds me of another point from the movie The Matrix. After the main character(Neo) has been disconnected from the Matrix, Morpheus(The man who disconnected him) begins to explain to him what the Matrix is and Neo suffers a complete mental breakdown. When he awakens Morpheus says:

“I feel I owe you an apology. We have a rule, we never free a mind once it’s reached a certain age. It’s dangerous, the mind has trouble letting go. I’ve seen it before and I’m sorry. I did what I did because…I had too”

Now for anyone who has watched the series you will know that it ends with the humans and machines making peace. But have you ever wondered what happened afterward? There are billions of people currently connected to the Matrix. Are they simply going to keep them all connected? Or are they going to eventually be disconnected? And therein lies the rub, CAN they be disconnected? If we are in fact living a lie and the goal is to “Awaken” us, then we are going to have to face the truth that some of us will not be able to accept it. Some of us have built so much of who we are around that lie and when the time comes those of us who cannot accept it are going to snap.

End Part 3

Part 4(and eventually my identity [JHS] coming soon. Not that anyone should care who I am but I hope to end all of this by pointing out that in order to have a minimum amount of casualties, the only solution to all of this is for everyone to no longer remain anonymous.)

 

> Waiting for the rest

Anonymous ID: 85acc9 June 5, 2020, 9:32 p.m. No.9497333   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7348 >>7366 >>7392

>>9497291 People who are not faggots to read.

I can post longer post if you would like..Here was freebie you guys wasted…

>>9337092 lb Hey THIS is for you NOW DO SOMETHING with it!

We need answers to these questions THE [MSM] will see once we EXPOSE themt to light.

>>9353803 pb

< Non-descriptive not repeating

#1.

Why did the DoJ learn about the FBI's interest in Flynn's conversations with the Russian Amb. from a CONVERSATION WITH OBAMA in the Oval Office?

Ask me!

>>9328302 pb

< See Image Obamagate 1

>>9328358 pb

< See Images Obamagate 3- (1-3)

>"President Obama asked if Comey was saying that the NSC should not pass sensitive information related to Russia to Flynn."

>('Hey Comey, are you saying we should hide Russia issues from Flynn?') "potentially" #ObamaKnew Jan 5 2017

#obamagate #DemandAnswers

1b. How did the illegal spying on Flynn originate?

Strange that Obama knew of the FBI's interest in Flynn's talk w/ the Russian Amb. before the DoJ knew.

#obamagate #DemandAnswers

DO YOU UNDERSTAND WHAT THIS IMPLIES?

>>> That the spying was directed by Obama.

>>9353900 pb

>It appears that the illegal spying was DIRECTED BY OBAMA.

>We don't have direct evidence, but the indirect evidence is strong.

>Occam's razor.

>HOW would Obama have known that the FBI planned to wiretap Flynn's conversation with the Russian Ambassador for the purpose of either (1) trying to catch Flynn in some purported illegal act or (2) trying to get Flynn fired because Flynn's position (DNI) and his potential or actual knowledge (of the Obama admin's illegal acts) was a DANGER to the success of their coup plot to overthrow the government and prevent President Trump from governing.

>HOW would Obama have known that, unless he was involving in the planning, origination, or direction of that part of the plot?

>And if Obama knew about or directed the BEGINNING of the plot, it's safe to say that Obama knew EVERYTHING about the plot from start to finish.

>It's an inference, but a very strong inference.

>Remember the Page/Strzok texts?

>"POTUS WANTS TO KNOW EVERYTHING WE'RE DOING"

< See image in >>9353946 pb

>>9353946 pb

>This could be a great chant for when we are protesting in the street.

>OBAMA KNEW!

>KNEW ABOUT THE COUP!

>OBAMA KNEW!

>KNEW ABOUT THE COUP!

>repeat until teargassed

 

#2.

Why was Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn unmasked by Obama's chief of staff, Joe Biden, Susan Rice, and others?

>>9334336 pb

< Covers Some content below no repost

>>9335035 pb

>Did they suspect Flynn of collaborating with an adversary? (NOthat was a red herring, not the real reason)

>–Was it a fishing expedition, hoping to find dirt on Trump so they could obstruct his presidency? (POSSIBLY, but that wasn't the fundamental reason either?)

>–Were they trying to create a cause of action for the eventual appointment of a special counsel to continually investigate a President (and his NSI, Flynn) who had done nothing wrong? YES!

>Their plan required demolishing the Trump presidency.

>It was bad enough that the people actually elected Trump.

>They had to either (1) impeach Trump during his 1st term (they tried), or (2) prevent Trump from having a 2nd term.

>They had to create a fake narrative that would make Trump look bad.

>Although [they] actually collaborated with individuals in Russia and elsewhere (e.g. Hillary selling the uranium and selling classified military secrets and Clinton Foundation receiving a $200M payment from Browder's Russian company AFTER Hillary arranged for the uranium sale, and Bill Clinton receiving a ridiculously large honorarium for giving a brief speech in Russia), their tactic was to attribute Russian collaboration to Trump. To deflect it from themselves. So that if Trump tried to defend himself with the truth (did not collaborate with Russia to win 2016 election), [they] could say, "Look, Trump is trying to shift the blame". So the accusations against Trump were 180 degrees opposite of what really happened and this was totally on purpose, contrived, anticipating how the defense against baseless accusations would go in a fake hoaxed-up indictment proceeding.

>No doubt they had the indictment in mind when unmasking Flynn. They HAD to create a pretext to surveil Flynn and 2nd-hand and 3rd-hand associations also scooped up in the illicit spying, hopefully scooping up all of Donald Trump's and his family's comms as well.

>The criminal case against Flynn was also part of the plan. They had to paint Flynn as a bad guy, a traitor, in order to smear Trump.

>The court proceeding also perhaps enabled some of the documentation to remain secret for a longer time than otherwise.

>Rosenstein and Mueller's special counsel also managed to drag the thing on longer so that if Trump publicly unearthed proof that the allegations against him were false, and the allegations against [them] were true, [they] could deflect by saying Trump said this solely for political reasons because he was under examination by Mueller's special counsel.

Ask me!

#obamagate #DemandAnswers

 

#3.

Why was Michael Flynn's identity leaked—a CRIMINAL ACT—to the press?

>>9328291 pb

< See image Obamagate 3-0

>>9310582 pb (Answer)

3b. Who leaked his name and those conversations to the press?

>Anyone who unmasked after 29-Dec-16 is a suspect.

>>9323072 pb (Follow up Questions)

>WHY was Flynn's ID leaked to the press?

>(Considering that leakage is a criminal act and the individual who leaked it likely knew they were breaking the law.)

>–WHAT did that individual hope to accomplish?

>–Did they leak to a known press ally with the intent that the leaked ID be published?

>–Was it to create a harsh public perception of the good General?

>–Was it to "launder" the info so it would seem to come from a journalist instead of directly from an Obama WH insider?

>–Was it to create a pretext for FBI interviewing Flynn?

>We KNOW from other declassified docs that the FBI set up Flynn. They wanted to frame him. They wanted to get him to lie and get him fired.

>–So WHY did they want Flynn fired?

>–Exactly HOW was Flynn a threat to their plans to usurp power and dump Donald Trump from the presidency by force? (I.e. a COUP)

>–What exact info / experience / contacts / plans did Flynn have that was detrimental to the Obama WH and/or detrimental to their plan to obstruct Trump's presidency?

>Let's do REAL JOURNALISM.

>The MSM is not going to answer these questions. They are too weak and stupid and corrupt. Their only motivation is to keep covering up the truth. We need anons to step up and do REAL JOURNALISM and dig into this puzzle and keep pulling the yarn until the pieces all come together.

#obamagate #DemandAnswers

 

#4.

Why did James Clapper, John Brennan, Samantha Power, and Susan Rice privately ADMIT UNDER OATH that they had no evidence of collusion, WHILE SAYING THE OPPOSITE PUBLICLY?

Ask me!

>>9356583 pb SEE IMAGE

>>9313342 pb

>We can do better. Real journalism requires facts, not just assertions.

>"When a person is prosecuted, there are separate federal regulations for perjury specifically and lying to the feds generally. Under the United States Code, title 18, section 1001, a person who knowingly or willingly makes a material statement that is false, or fraudulent, to the feds, is guilty of a crime. What comes as a surprise to many is that unlike section 1621, section 1001 does not require that a person be under oath.

>The difficulty that comes in prosecuting these crimes is the requirement that the statements be made knowingly or willingly. This allows those being accused of, or investigated for, perjury, to assert a lack of knowledge at the time of the statement that the statement was false. However, this may not be compelling enough to defeat or avoid a prosecution if contradictory evidence exists. Additionally, individuals who lie out of fear, or provide evasive answers, during a federal investigation, frequently find themselves facing the threat of federal prosecution."

https://blogs.findlaw.com/blotter/2017/03/what-are-the-penalties-for-lying-to-congress.html

>Trying to teach anons how to think.

>Are there some lazy minds here?

>I'll cut anons a break. Maybe some anons never saw real journalism.

>You grab a thread and start pulling on it. You ask questions and pull on all of them too. You construct the logical connections and write down what you find and what the proof is.

>Then you are RIGHT and you can WRITE.

>>9323600 pb

https://americanlookout.com/washington-post-accidentally-reveals-who-leaked-flynn-call-nine-obama-administration-officials/

>February 17, 2017

>Obama loyalists working in Washington set the wheels in motion to take Flynn down before Obama was even out of office.

>The Washington Post may have accidentally spilled the beans on this in a recent article.

>“Neither of those assertions is consistent with the fuller account of Flynn’s contacts with Kislyak provided by officials who had access to reports from U.S. intelligence and law enforcement agencies that routinely monitor the communications of Russian diplomats. Nine current and former officials, who were in senior positions at multiple agencies at the time of the calls, spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss intelligence matters.”

>“At the time of the calls” means these officials were in office during the Obama Administration.

That means it was nine Obama officials who leaked the calls.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/national-security-adviser-flynn-discussed-sanctions-with-russian-ambassador-despite-denials-officials-say/2017/02/09/f85b29d6-ee11-11e6-b4ff-ac2cf509efe5_story.html

>>9324175 pb

>Until those phone call transcripts get released, not sure how much interest OG will continue to generate.

>DJT's got everyone running down rabbit holes with the Morning Joe story.

>Got to accept it's an old story and gets stale easily without fresh meat.

>If there were 9 sources for the Flynn leak as the Post claims, that would be a statement by them.

>Ballsy move that achieved its objective - got Flynn out of WH.

>And each could provide cover for the other - safety in numbers.

>With Rice's memo as icing on the cake for Hussein - giving him and them an added layer of insulation.

>Bet they thought their names would never be exposed though.

>>9324269 pb

>9 sources for the Flynn leak as the Post claims

They wanted to make SURE the leak got out. Getting Flynn's name published must have been CRITICALLY IMPORTANT to their plan.

>>9324271 pb

>Because they had nothing to back up their Russia collusion claims and even unmasking him didnt prove a crime committed.

>So they leaked to the press because then that could be used to back up their investigation, as false evidence.

>They still never could charge him with a crime pertaining to Russia, or election meddling etc. And as Priestap's notes said the goal was to get him to lie or trick him because it was THAT important to remove him

>>9334329 pb << SEE IMAGES IN PB

>The FBI documents that put Barack Obama in the ‘Obamagate’ narrative

>Agents fretted sharing Flynn intel with departing Obama White House would become fodder for ‘partisan axes to grind.’

>Just 17 days before President Trump took office in January 2017, then-FBI counterintelligence agent Peter Strzok texted bureau lawyer Lisa Page, his mistress, to express concern about sharing sensitive Russia probe evidence with the departing Obama White House.

>Strzok had just engaged in a conversation with his boss, then-FBI Assistant Director William Priestap, about evidence from the investigation of incoming National Security Adviser Michael Flynn, codenamed Crossfire Razor, or “CR” for short.

>The evidence in question were so-called "tech cuts" from intercepted conversations between Flynn and Russian ambassador Sergey Kislyak, according to the texts and interviews with officials familiar with the conversations.

>Strzok related Priestap’s concerns about the potential the evidence would be politically weaponized if outgoing Director of National Intelligence James Clapper shared the intercept cuts with the White House and President Obama, a well-known Flynn critic.

>“He, like us, is concerned with over sharing,” Strzok texted Page on Jan. 3, 2017, relating his conversation with Priestap. “Doesn’t want Clapper giving CR cuts to WH. All political, just shows our hand and potentially makes enemies.”

>Page seemed less concerned, knowing that the FBI was set in three days to release its initial assessment of Russian interference in the U.S. election.

>“Yeah, but keep in mind we were going to put that in the doc on Friday, with potentially larger distribution than just the DNI,” Page texted back.

>Strzok responded, “The question is should we, particularly to the entirety of the lame duck usic [U.S Intelligence Community] with partisan axes to grind.”

>That same day Strzok and Page also discussed in text messages a drama involving one of the Presidential Daily Briefings for Obama.

>“Did you follow the drama of the PDB last week?” Strzok asked.

>"Yup. Don’t know how it ended though,” Page responded.

>“They didn’t include any of it, and Bill [Priestap] didn’t want to dissent,” Strzok added.

>“Wow, Bill should make sure [Deputy Director] Andy [McCabe] knows about that since he was consulted numerous times about whether to include the reporting,” Page suggested.

https://justthenews.com/accountability/russia-and-ukraine-scandals/fbi-documents-put-barack-obama-obamagate-narrative

Additional QUESTIONS

>Is it perjury to lie to a Congressional committee?

>Did these individuals give sworn testimony before Congress? When?

>Are the transcripts public? Where?

>Can we identify where in their sworn statements they denied any evidence of (Trump-Russia) collusion?

>Can we identify the public statements asserting that there WAS (Trump-Russia) collusion?

>If these statements differ as alleged,

>is that perjury?

>Is it a criminal offense?

>What statute?

>What's the penalty if found guilty?

#obamagate #DemandAnswers

 

#5.

Why did the Obama administration use opposition research— funded by a political organization and filled with foreign dirt—to spy on members of the Trump campaign?

Ask me!

>>9336469 pb

>Here's a little bit of research establishing that opposition research funded by a political organization was indeed used:

>The [anti-Trump rag] Washington Post admitted on Oct 25, 2017 that the DNC and Hillary’s presidential campaign helped pay for the opposition research that resulted in the discredited “dodgy dossier” alleging collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia. (https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/debra-heine/2017/10/25/clinton-campaign-dnc-paid-oppo-research-led-discredited-anti-trump-dossier-n54220)

>According to the Washington Post, the opposition research firm Fusion GPS was retained in April 2016 by Marc Elias (of law firm Perkins Coie), a lawyer representing the Clinton campaign and the DNC. Fusion GPS then hired former British spy Christopher Steele to conduct the research (i.e. to assemble false rumors and innuendo into a "dossier" of allegations that Trump and his campaign actively colluded with the Russian government during the 2016 election). (I hate that word "dossier" because the word itself implies a package of credible evidence on a person.)

>The FBI used "dossier" - in conjunction with a Yahoo News report - in their fraudulent application for a FISA warrant. A version of the "dossier" was leaked to Yahoo News, which in turn wrote an article; this article was used in an attempt to create credibility for the "dossier" in a process that we could call "intelligence laundering", i.e. a circuitous route that tries to conceal the actual source of intel.

>None of the dossier’s allegations of collusion have been verified. Lawyers for Steele admitted in court filings in April 2017 (http://www.cnn.com/2017/05/02/politics/donald-trump-spy-dossier/index.html) that Steele's work was not verified and was never meant to be made public.

>The Federalist reported that OFA, Obama’s 2016 campaign arm, paid nearly $800,000 to Perkins Coie in 2016 alone, according to FEC records. The first 2016 payments to Perkins Coie, classified only as “Legal Services,” were made April 25-26, 2016, and totaled $98,047. A second batch of payments, also classified as “Legal Services,” were disbursed to the law firm on September 29, 2016, and totaled $700,000. Payments from OFA to Perkins Coie in 2017 totaled $174,725 through August 22, 2017. (https://thefederalist.com/2017/10/29/obamas-campaign-gave-972000-law-firm-funneled-money-fusion-gps/)

>So the next questions we need to get into are

>- "filled with foreign dirt" (i.e. what was in the dossier and can we prove that it was false? Perhaps somebody admitted it was false?)

>and

>- WHY was the dossier used by the Obama admin?

>Any budding journalists want to step up?

>Almost got this thing nailed…

#obamagate #DemandAnswers

extra images

https://imgur.com/a/1iVLZ7W

 

 

-–

 

Rought draft Part 1

On America on January 5, 2017, five powerful people met in the Oval Office of the White House. They were powerful, does not mean they were just. Americans should be careful who is in power. Comey, Yates, Biden, Obama, and Rice meeting was recalled by Rice in an email sent to herself on January 20, 2017.

"President Obama asked if Comey was saying that the NSC (National Security Council) should not pass sensitive information related to Russsia to Flynn," Rice typed in her email. Obama asked Comey if he thought the NSC should not pass Russian-related information to Flynn. Comey replied "potentially".

The sentence, "President Obama asked if Comey was saying that the NSC (National Security Council) should not pass sensitive information related to Russsia to Flynn," SHOWS much. "Preisdent Obama asked… ," indicates that President Obama knew of FBI's interest in Flynn's talk with the Russian Ambassader before the DOJ knew. This could mean Obama directed the spying of Flynn, since Obama knew before the DOJ.

Notes and Questions:

 

>What date did the DOJ find out?

 

Part 2 rough draft

The story of Michael T. Flynn, Sergey I. Kislyak and nine Obama officials might be confusing to the average American. Ask them who is Kislyak, how many do you think might know? If the reader does not know Kislyak, the reader will have to catch up.

New York Times (NYT) article 'Timeline: What We Now Know About Flynn’s Phone Calls With Russia' describes the timeline of Flynn/Kislyak communications on Dec 28-29, 2016. Obama signs executive order to put sanctions on Russia on Dec 28. The article explains Kislyak contacts Flynn on Dec 28, 2016, not the other way around. On Dec 29 Flynn calls a senior transition officer to find out what to say to Kislyak. Flynn learns through the transition official that members of the presidential transition team did not want Russia to escalate the situation. Flynn then calls Kislyak and asks that Russia not to escalate the situation. The NYT article shows that Kislyak contacted Flynn Dec 28, Flynn contacted a senior transition official, and then Flynn called Kislyak after talking to a senior transition official with instructions to ask Kislyak that Russia not escalate the situation.

Another article from Washington Examiner made an interesting observation. "The date on which Biden received the information about Flynn, Jan. 12, was the same day the Washington Post ran a column by David Ignatius containing leaked classified details from Flynn's call with the Russian ambassador." There are many interesting questions that the media seems to ignore and does not ask. For example, it's interesting that Rice sent an email to herself. It's interesting how many people unmasked Flynn in Dec 2016 -Jan 2017. When all the pieces are put together, so much appears NOT to have been done by the book. One anonymous person asks a good question: "Were they trying to create a cause of action for the eventual appointment of a special counsel to continually investigate a President (and his NSI, Flynn) who had done nothing wrong?"

'They' might include Rice, Biden, Obama, Yates, and Comey since they were at the January 5th meeting memorialized by Rice's email to herself on Jan 20, 2017. Rod Rosenstein may also be involved because he set up the special counsel with Mueller. If Rod is dirty, then Mueller is also likely dirty. The Mueller report was a huge failure and cost Americans millions. Even after the Mueller report failed to impeach President Trump, many media outlets continued to use the report to attack Trump, his friends, family, and support. Court proceedings also enabled 'them' to keep certain facts secret so 'they' could further deceive the American People.

 

Sources:

1 https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/02/14/us/politics/flynn-call-russia-timeline.html

2 https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/biden-and-other-obama-officials-received-unmasking-information-on-michael-flynn-declassified-records-show

 

Part 3 rough draft

 

On May 22, 2020, Kayleigh McEnany (KM) asked the press, "why was Michael Flynn's identity leaked, a criminal act, to the press?" Would KM describe it as a criminal act in front of press and America if it were not true? Looking at the declassified documents, we can see most of the people who unmasked Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn including Samantha Power, Clapper, Degnan, Brennan, Conlon, Lew, Biden, and more. The criminal act of leaking Flynn's identity is in the list of names of people who unmasked Flynn after Dec 29, 2016.

The list of people who unmasked Flynn gives us the 'WHO'. Americans should also ask themselves why was Flynn's identity leaked to the press? What advantages would that bring a group of people intent on ruining Trump's chances of staying president or winning a second term? If Trump is out, fake news and fake leaders can continue to make fools of the American People. Once Americans find out how deceitful Obama's group plays the game, they can use their power of vote and free speech to search for truth, share truth, and Vote accordingly.

McEnany called it a criminal act. Comey, Yates, Obama, Rice, and Clapper also know that it was a criminal act, yet they and fake news rarely bring up. This incident brings forth even more questions. What did the leaker hope to accomplish? Which press member specifically did they leak too? Would the leak make Flynn appear to be a bad actor? Was it to create a pretext for FBI to interviewing Flynn? We know from other declassified docs that the FBI set up Flynn. They wanted to frame him. They wanted to get him to lie and get him fired. WHY? Exactly HOW was Flynn a threat to their plans to usurp power and dump Donald Trump from the presidency by force i.e. a coup? What exact information, experience, contacts, and plans did Flynn have that was detrimental to the Obama White House and detrimental to their plan to obstruct Trump's presidency? Knowing the answers will reveal the criminal(s) involved with leaking Lt. Gen Flynn's identity and much more.