>No seriously, what can we do about these glowing douchebags doing internet guerilla warfare on us. They tend to appeal to younger people who fall for "yeah Im fucking the system by joining anonymouse"
1- prolly good not to give the moar exposure/press, sensationalisation or any credence or response. it is in their interest and Op goals to challenge us (which means some type of recognition of their threat
2- they will fail so if in the future Q wants to address them he can cite their failure, not sure Q would waste time, except to expose them or link them in some way that harms not them necessarily, but their supporters.
3-a bulletproof link of evidence showing them directly related to something detrimental to their credibility could be good, but it would have to be a virtual deathblow, that would go viral with our SM folk/twatters
4- again any attention steered towards them will work to their benefit tho, so I would just ignore, any escalation or attention is what they want.
5- we have no challengers or adversaries, just pushing truths, THEIR plan is always to create a competitor for those that have none, then they divide and weaken