Almost.
>DO NOT REPLY. Filter and move on.
Calling them out for what they are isn't the same thing as responding and engaging with them.
If the shills are not pushed back against, it makes it appear that anons agree with them; I won't be stopping because you want me to. I'm actually going to call them out more because you concern fagged about it.
I do not filter; It's a crutch for the newfags.
So you are fine with shills injecting false consensus without any push back?
Do you agree with what they state?
Do you wish to be associated with (((their))) narrative because you kept your mouth shut?
Did keeping their mouth shut serve the Germans well under Hitler?
GTFO.
>So you are fine with shills injecting false consensus without any push back?
>Do you agree with what they state?
>Do you wish to be associated with (((their))) narrative because you kept your mouth shut?
>Did keeping their mouth shut serve the Germans well under Hitler?
> I am … The false consensus dissapears
Only for you. Newfags still see it. . I'm not doing it for you. I'm doing it for them.
Ignoring them only allows them to work under the radar. Engaging them wastes bread. Mocking them denies them any sense of morale. Laughter is a hell of a weapon ;)