Will you publish pieces actually written by anons? Articles and such? Or just notables?
These are on 2 opposing sides. Making memes that are inaccurate are not helpful and only add to the confusion brought about by the intentional mis-teaching of history.
ANTIFA were the RED SHIRTS in Germany, beating the hell out of anyone who didnt' want to be COMMUNIST - they worked for the German COMMUNIST PARTY.
The connection Q wants us to draw for the public awareness is that ANTIFA are the armed wing of the modern COMMUNIST PARTY also known as DEMOCRAT PARTY here in the US.
What you are proposing to do is that exact opposite of what Q brought forth.
ANTIFA: paramilitary wing of German Communist Party then paramilitary wing of the Democrat Party now
Did you miss the @DrawAndStrike thread where it's explained that POTUS has sent feds in from myriad agencies to every state, and he does not need permission from anyone to do that?
He's "harnessing the full power of the federal government" here without having to use the military.
It was a very good thread, worth reading.
I have some articles for you, but they are too long for 2, char posts here, so have to be multi-posts. Is that okay?
>joe mc carthy was right all along
He absolutely was, which is why he had to be stopped. Diana West has an excellent book about their infiltration, and it is the missing piece of the puzzle as to how the Cultural Marxists were able to be so smoothly inserted into media and academia almost as soon as they arrived in the US.
They are there to keep the people protesting safe from the violent, and also property safe from the violent. The People are not the enemy.
I have to agree about descriptive titles* - I read notables off-site every day, and plainly descriptive titles really help. Also spelling names properly (Newsom instead of Gruesom) makes a difference. Many people around the world read notables and will not understand that type of pun.
Plain, descriptive titles are imperative.
*while not getting involved with conflicts with bakers/notetakers
>When retweeting or capping tweets you think may be deleted why not screenshot them and just post jpg.?
ARCHIVE IMMEDIATELY, then take screenshots
archive.today
archive.org
The Memory Hole is real
It doesn't work because it's the exact opposite of actual verifiable factual history.
ANTIFA WERE THE RED SHIRTS
Commies then, commies NOW
BOTH.
Screencaps can be faked, ESPECIALLY TWEETS. It's very, very easy.
Archiving a tweet is also very, very easy, serves to prove the real screenshot is real AND archive.today gives you a zip file of the page you archives so you can archive offline
Yes, all 3 are best
If you stand back and look at the bigger picture, it's obvious. Down in the weeds it is easy to be manipulated by the FUD posters.
Many do not think it through - when Q posts or things heat up… who shows up en masse?
FUD (fear uncertainty doubt) posting - all their posts are meant to discourage, detract and demoralize anons. But they wouldn't be here if anons were not effective.
So when they show up, my heart gladdens!
Good morning, my fren!
All true. I'm thinking of foreigners who read the notables, not really about myself, but it will work itself out, no worries.
There are so many great people on this TEAM - it's a beautiful thing to see. Everyone who puts in effort, anonymously, selflessly and tirelessly is a GEM, and we are so blessed.
That's it, thank you, anon! It's really worth the listen.