Anonymous ID: 9f836e April 8, 2018, 9:29 a.m. No.951615   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1639 >>1931

>>951599

>catholics

Correction, it's for faithful christians, not just the apostate cult. Anyway it's symbolic, to signify that they live not by bread alone, but by every Word of God, which Jesus was and is. Satan always perverts Godly things, so naturally they turn it into literally eating humans.

Anonymous ID: 9f836e April 8, 2018, 9:42 a.m. No.951776   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1810

>>951759

>You must be new

No. I remember when you were "asked" to leave Github, I just didn't follow the site or your rationale for using CF, because I'm an anon not a normie newfag and I get intel direct from source. Why is CF the only solution at this time? You don't need to use CF.

Anonymous ID: 9f836e April 8, 2018, 9:46 a.m. No.951826   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1836

>>951810

>You may be confusing me with codefag

Ah could be.

>What alternative to CF is there?

There was a time where sites were served directly from servers. I'm confused as to why you think a CDN is necessary at all?

Anonymous ID: 9f836e April 8, 2018, 9:48 a.m. No.951853   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1876

>>951836

You need to cut your fucking snark nigger. You're new to imageboards and your lack of tech clue is mildly annoying.

>A CDN is necessary

>babby's first website

Anonymous ID: 9f836e April 8, 2018, 10:01 a.m. No.952008   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2084

>>951943

He's a low grade tech that's probably used to running Windows servers and is becoming dangerously pompous. He can't even properly configure SSL through a GUI, let alone manual configuration from command line.

>What's the right path here, in your opinion?

You have to strike a balance. If your site is running sensitive info like anything Q related would be, using 3rd party stuff should be last resort as to limit the exposure of your users. Before using Cloudflare, I would have launched direct from server and then monitored. If traffic grows beyond a server, implement simple scaling. If DDoS couldn't be handled, or traffic needs exceed one's ability to scale, then and only then would a CDN be reasonable.

Anonymous ID: 9f836e April 8, 2018, 10:10 a.m. No.952111   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2181

>>952084

Sure, anything is possible. What's the goal though? That's the best place to start.

>using the code on qanon.pub

Being that the dev behind the site is obviously a low grade tech, I wouldn't touch the code. It's trivial to implement your own CDN, for example, so thinking about CF as a necessity is further telling.

Anonymous ID: 9f836e April 8, 2018, 10:18 a.m. No.952217   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2268

>>952181

>everything in one area 8ch

The problem is that floods the site with more normies than have already been flooded to it. You need a separate site to refer normies to when referencing Q posts.

>>952191

Go back to plebbit nigger. Typically I would but I feel too many normies here and some offensive material is needed. Keep encouraging me and we'll gore it up for a few threads.

Anonymous ID: 9f836e April 8, 2018, 10:26 a.m. No.952331   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>952302

That's why standard practice is to post archive links, but from the beginning the flood of normies hasn't cared enough. So fuck them, they can get exposed and waxed.