https://web.archive.org/web/20200517162150/https:/twitter.com/ObamaFoundation/status/1262054709772324866
Why was the pic in the ARCHIVED May 17 ObamaFoundation tweet deleted?
The tweet was archived on May 18, but it doesn't show up!
WAYBACK MACHINE HAS JUST DELETED EVERY ARCHIVED VERSION OF THE OBAMAFOUNDATION TWEET FROM THE SEARCH RESULTS
https:/twitter.com/ObamaFoundation/status/1262054709772324866
DOES NOT RETURN ANY HITS!
Direct link:
https://web.archive.org/web/20200517162150/https://twitter.com/ObamaFoundation/status/1262054709772324866
Pic in tweet has been DELETED FROM THE INTERNET ARCHIVE.
It does matter, because the ObamaFoundation TWEET was on May 17, and the archived tweet (which while deleted from the search results is still saved at archive.org) has a blank spot for where that Obama.org pic supposedly 'originally' came from.
You're panicking.
THE TWEET FROM MAY 17 WITH THE PIC IS THE SITE IN QUESTION THAT HAS BEEN DELETED FROM THE ARCHIVE.ORG SEARCH RESULTS, AND THE ARCHIVED TWEET HAS A BLACK SPOT FOR WHERE THE ORIGINAL PIC WAS.
What is with these "does not matter" narratives?
Every time you say that it only reinforces that it does matter.
"image is set by code that doesn't carry over to the archive"
That's a clearly false statement.
The images ARE carried over to the archive, as the other ObamaFoundation tweet shows in the same snippet above.
You're still confused because you keep presuming the same narrative that the pic from the Obama.org site was only made after May 25.
Yes, we know the pic was linked from Obama.org, but the tweet from May 17, archived on May 18, and now deleted from the archive.org search results, clearly shows a deleted portion OF THAT SAME linked Obama.org URL.
The narrative that the Obama.org site was just updated and then Twitter 'grabbed whatever the site provides', does not explain why it was deleted from archive.org, nor does it explain why the May 17 tweet was deleted entirely from the archive's search results.
HAHAHAHAHAHA