Anons - (long time codefag here) - I know this subject has been beaten to death, but I STILL haven't seen anybody mention the obvious about Q's George Floyd photo post. Anybody who's been here a while knows that the qmap.pub site owners add their own title to Q posts. Q said NOTHING about the posting dates of any images on the obama foundation Twitter link (card). The ONLY message he posted was "reconcile" with a link to the Tweet. That's it.

It was the qmap.pub people who added the title "Reconcile: ObamaFoundation Post Made 8 Days BEFORE He Died Displaying Picture of Flyod" on THEIR website. Q had no say over that (they even spelled 'Floyd' as 'Flyod').

But since we're on the subject, a Twitter post date/time is not the same as the Twitter card for their website. The Twitter "Card" is a dynamic display the gets it's information from meta tags on their website landing page (this is NOT their Twitter page/account). The obama.org site devs control the information & images on that Twitter card. What people are seeing when they go the Tweet link posted by Q is a Twitter post WITHOUT images added at the time of posting. What you DO see is an image of Floyd that was added to their Twitter card configuration at a later date.

What's the takeaway?

1.) The Floyd image was added to the obama foundation Twitter card configuration AFTER the post was made on Twitter (nothing remarkable about that).

2.) Q didn't say what he meant by "reconcile".

3.) qmap.pub folks added a title to THEIR post based on their assumption of what they thought Q meant by "reconcile" (not what Q actually said).

I WOULD wonder about Twitter's security though. Based on the pseudo code posted later by Q, I might be concerned about the passing of a username and password as an environment variable from the server to an outside website. But then, the real question might be that with all that we know about Twitter's dirty tricks, how do we even know they haven't been gathering Patriots information all along?