>>9522100 (pb)

Look man at this point the shit cant NOT be coordinated. I think most of us agree. Here anyways…

I havent looked into the stuff personally or caught connections. Feeling pretty under the weather. Sinus issues etc. But gf told me last night places like Australia, Canada, France, UK, Britain…

Their protests include "[country] isnt innocent" or some shit. Knowing those places alone and the whole "0bummer"gate shit and all this coming to a head and then a giant nothing happened yesterday and no antifa

I thought "hmm wonder if antifa was a big comped ruse. Seeing as how "they" were a global thing." Like an easy trap. I really need to spend time with the kids ijs itd be curious to find out what these places may have. Or if hill/obama been there "following potus" type shit

See what im saying?

Ima get off here but an honest "yes this may be worth looking into" or "fake and gay" is fine. Maybe im onto something maybe not. Wanted anons thoughts in general even before digs. And if digs happen, any noticeable patters that suggest further looking into.

Take care anons, shills, bots, patriots all bueno

>>9522072 (pb)

Idk man re read 2nd degree murder

I posted the other day. Nothinf involving drivebys should be considered.

However…the last part though…starts to add up and then gotta wonder WHAT PROTECTIVE TYPE ORDER DID FLOYD POTENTIAL HAVE

Witness protection? CI? Restraining order on chauvin? Any of these make sense why he didnt wanna get in car with him.

D.a. didnt wanna discuss something similar to "ongoing investigations"

Its not how he gets off

Its how he gets convicted.

Its also how it allows for discovery (should speculation be true) into (potential) crimes higher up than the police department. They thought they burned down the evidence at that station?

I propose the black cop received something from floyd that will prove a valuable clue.

Take this suggestion seriously

>>9523811

Do you ever let your enemies know your plan? Why would you let them just come in the front door

(Castle Law)

Come on now

>>9524046

I see you and dont necessarily disagree. But these things need consideration

1. Define trap

2. Define bait

3. Define bluff

Sure I could be wrong. The mattis flip, the talxum x flip…

Idk man i may not be