Yesterday I sent evidence SARS-Cov2 interferes with a human cell's sodium channel, a pathogenicity not found in Bats and Pangolin coronaviruses strongly suggesting it was inserted in a lab:
http://archive.is/dSAT6#selection-983.167-987.285
http://archive.is/dSAT6#selection-995.0-995.447
It turns out scientists from Norway and England are proposing a Covid-19 vaccine to target the aforementioned sodium channel. Within their proposal they use a term from bio-engineering and gain of function research: "chimeric". They also described the virus' sodium channel pathology as "inserted". While the authors never claim SARS-Cov2 was bio-engineered they are using words associated with "gain of function" research.
Conclusion: the authors can't say outright SARS-Cov2 was bio-engineered because it would never make it past the censors so they slipped in language that says as much, a dog whistle if you will to other scientists.
"We propose that the dual effect general method of action OF THIS CHIMERIC VIRUS'S SPIKE, including receptor binding domain, includes membrane components other than the ACE2 receptor, which explains clinical evidence of its infectivity and pathogenicity."
"We show the non-receptor dependent phagocytic general method of action to be specifically related to cumulative charge FROM INSERTED SECTIONS PLACED ON THE SARS-CoV-2 Spike surface in positions to bind efficiently by salt bridge formations"
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/DBBC0FA6E3763B0067CAAD8F3363E527/S2633289220000083a.pdf/biovacc19_a_candidate_vaccine_for_covid19_sarscov2_developed_from_analysis_of_its_general_method_of_action_for_infectivity.pdf