Be a UK patriot, anon. Fight “the good fight” for justice at home.
I think, by US MIL, Q means the US Mil Intelligence fighting the Deep State (domestic) and Cabal (international) enemies of its people “foreign and domestic”.
Would not recomm, and probly not Q either, oaths of allegiance to a foreign power. Q appreciates patriots from all countries who fight for justice within their own countries.
Nice connections. If Q didn’t use them, they should have!
Well, device is repaired. Have lurked. But have been self-teaching about constellations and stars. I mentioned this before but will post idea again and more fleshed out. It does not involve Orion, but another constellation that is called Hydra. Anons were all over the name months back after Q dropped about Ghidra, even making puns about staying hydrated. A Hydra is a dragon with many heads. (Who chose the name of this bread btw?)
Before I start, can I ask, Just how deviously cryptic can Q go?
Okay, this dig is raw, but anons know I like to share, and this can critique the dig early, either shooting it down or causing some good input or collaboration.
So, in the Embankment pics series(including LisaMI6, NSATrafCam2847,Rot1,Rot2,CH1etc., only one of those pics was able to be manipulated so you could bring out stars in the sky: London2847.
In digging about constellations and stars and objects, came across there being such a thing as objects in constellations being given NGC numbers, numbers with four figures. NGC means New.General Catalog of nebulae and clusters of stars. I ran NGC2847 and there is such a thing in the Hydra constellation.
Coincidence- the only Embankment pic London2847 and there is such a thing and it is visible in a Winter constellation in the Northern Hemisphere(ie London). Have had a wild notion of identifying the stars in the Q pic and, using a program that you can back-date, getting a narrow timeframe as to when the Q Embankment pics were taken. Why? Can be used to match people who were in London at the time. Have been learning a lot about constellations to say the least. Have been using our current working theory, based on recent anon observations on the UK thread, that the pics appear to be after business hours for the Tatts and Hispaniola. Also, based on anons’ observations, the pics occurred during a High Tide. Also, based on historical pic evidence, the LisaMI6 pic does not have a banner advertising Christmas Party bookings as has been shown by a pic of the Tatts Tin-eyed to mid-October 2014(in the future for our target search.) Also, observed here on the UK thread, the LisaMI6 pic could not have been replicated after 31DEC2014.
Also observed by an anon on UK thread, the removal of a specific type of traffic bollard visible in Q’s CH pics was removed in March of 2014. Target timeframe now Jan, Feb, Mar of 2014. So, I made a list of expected High Tides from a Thames Tides site for those months. When I used those dates in a free Constellation/Star program, i could see the Hydra constellation progressing across the Sky Chart for dates in Feb.
Forgot to add, the view looking up Victoria Embankment Road in the NSATrafCAM pics looks due SOUTH. The viewing setting I chose was due South. The star chart program allowed me ti use a default London, Greater London as my location/ viewing point.
With much trial and error, I came across a small star cluster, with faint objects, it is called Pyxis. Short for Pyxis Nautica or “Mariner’s Compass”. Hmmm, maps compasses. Anyway, dropping these screen grabs in a couple of posts, as am phonefagging and no fancy graphics here. I do the best I can though. I found one date, 18FEB2014, using my High Tide chart predictions, that placed this constellation due South, AND ….
would put object NGC2847 in the field of view as well. Will try to post caps in a logical order but well, you know, you can figure it out. So, can Q be this deviously cryptic in Q clues?
More caps and some sites used.
https://in-the-sky.org/skymap.php
https://astrochallenge.com/objects/dso/3899/
I can check. Will involve me first getting the high tides for Nov. 2013. Then, running them into the In-the-sky program. What are you looking for? Anything in particular? Duplication of results?
I thought there was consensus enuf to cross out December for the Embankment pics. Still not sure? What about them probly advertising Christmas party bookings(as a practice)from mid Oct. to Christmas? And no such banner on Lisa pic? Just askin.
>This is why I cannot be certain it is really high tide being seen.
There is no denying that pic of the Hispaniola shows her at a tide higher than any pic I have been able to find. And by the way, it actually corroborates a higher Thames River flow from rain runoff upstream. I challenge you to find a pic of HISPANIOLA higher than the NSA Cam pic.
It’s always clear after a good rain. Clean clear air. You get try to get an after-the-fact almanac of what the rain was like each day to eliminate the days/evenings of rain. How’s our calendar coming?
Let us all try to imagine the possibility of one of these types (US) actually “working” (having a secret meeting) with their counterparts. Now yes, they might have to try to arrange meetings beyond their normal M-F 9 to 5 schedule. Probably could do a red-eye flight to London but would arrive next day in the afternoon. So “meeting” probly for dinner in the evening on Saturday? Then jet back home on Sunday. Back to work on Monday.
Now Holidays? They’d get “beaten within an inch of their lives” by their wives. And try getting a gathering of six to be all able to skip a Holiday with their fam. Like herding conspiratorial cats. Imho. Just giving you a hard time, Boatfag.
Thanks very much, Anon. Glad to see you back. My date was Feb. 18, 2014. Time of evening may vary. I usually left it a 2330hrs. A good time for viewing. After 11pm closing for M-Th and at closing for Sundays. As for Friday and Sat., I was not expecting that much traffic after 3am closing.
For me, I would use deltas of 5 days in my searches. It would show me more quickly where the constellations were traversing on the horizon. Using South as always. Glad we didn’t lose you, Anon.
Oh, I should tell you, I realized a day or so ago, I just wasn’t going to find a constellation that looked like that fish-shaped star cluster, and I knew I had to look beyond or around the stick figures of the constellations that they give you. It kind of started to dawn on me when one website depicted a constellation different from another website. The past few days, I looked for tetrahedrons and crosses and hexagram angles, so I may be seeing them in my sleep now.
So, what Ifound is a part of Pyxis and a part of another constellation next to it. And did you see, those 3 stars show up below it as well. Might not be air traffic? But we did have to acknowledge that it could be air traffic.
Q’s Lisa pic still got you beat for High Tide. See pics.
Which is one of the 11pm closings which are a great match for vehicle traffic. Also, High tide was projected to be at 10:17pm.
Has Anon considered the “Easter egg” left for us on Goog StreetView in the form of that LG G2 ad being up on the billboard for us to timeframe PIC CIRCUS when GoogStreetView cam crew were taking captures? What were the odds?
Possibility of other Easter eggs in 16FEB2018 GoogStreetView left there on street for us?
Went thru projected high tide times for January and February. Not seeing good matches for PYXIS in January. Am posting best matches for Pyxis to the South using high tide dates and closing times for the TATTS. Here are the 8 closest matches. Mind I have included a couple of captures that are a little too much to the Southwest (to the left) but included so anons can see the appearance of Pyxis at different points on the horizon. We want Pyxis high enough from the horizon for our little star cluster to be able to descend to the left and yet be somewhat centered.
The other.4.
Sorry, there actually was one in JAN.
So my closest choices at this point are:
3 JAN, 2014
2 FEB, 2014
10 FEB, 2014
11 FEB, 2014
13 FEB, 2014
18 FEB, 2014
25 FEB, 2014
26 FEB, 2014
But again, some included for reference but not a candidate.