>>9570571 lb

Re-read drops, and post several of them to support your speculation. Or news articles. Or anything you can find. Anons post with some kind of sauce when claiming their opinion is a certain fact.

I am keeping an open mind for anything, and don't really care either way as long as the winning is gllorious. But here are some Q statements against your theory that RR is "our guy":

>[[RR]] central figure within docs (personally involved).

KNOWN CONFLICT.

>Immediate impeachment / resignation / termination / recusal IF EVER BROUGHT TO LIGHT.

>[[RR]] approved/signed FISA-warrant application(s) to extend surveillance on POTUS/others.

>[RR] attempts to stall DECLAS and/or REDACT have FAILED.

>PANIC IN DC

>[LL] recorded calls w/ [RR]?

>[LL] talking?

>When the info is released [RR] no more.

>[RR] must either comply with all document demands or face impeachment.

>2-way failure.

>If he complies, he fails (self-implication)(known conflict).

>If he failes to comply, he gets impeached (removed).

>Goodbye, Mr. Rosenstein.