>>9570226 (lb)
>>9570236 (lb)
>Darwin
was comped AF. He approves, cause he's a commie satanist.
His "theories" never were proven, can never be "proven", are not "science", contradict reality, never fully explain anything, really on MILLIONS of years to accomplish that which can be done damn near instantaneously, and were funded and promoted by the same people who brought you Karl Marx.
Also, they infringe on our Constitutional Rights now that they are being forced upon us via democratic-run public education propaganda.
>>9570417 (lb)
>College education at its finest.
Exactly.
Here's what you won't hear from our "finest" "educators"
These ideologies were brought in with the specific intent to destabilize our society as a whole. In Darwin's case, they teach concepts like "evolution" via "natural selection" to promote egotistical ideologies that falsely assume that we are the greatest things ever to walk the Earth, RIGHT NOW, after MILLIONS of years of "perfected" chaos. That "evolved" from "primitive" monkeys. "Survival of the fittest" contradicts the fact that we have a civilized world to begin with. We would not have a society if it was every man for himself, which is why his ideology was promoted by elites.
According to Darwin, there was never any "order". It was all random. "Chemical" interactions and BILLIONS of years was "created" us. Which is BULL SHIT. We've never actually observed "MILLIONS" of years. Therefore, we don't have time to "prove" Darwin's theories. We're still technically missing the "missing links". "DNA evidence" does not "prove" anything for Darwin either. On the contrary, it proves his general opposition.
Darwinian principles lie on the foundations of uniformitarian ideologies, which claim that "the key to the past, is by observing the present". Sounds nice, but the problem lies in the fact that they've failed to "observe" some of the most obvious parts of Nature. Thus, they've resulted in never-ending "mysteries" that "defy" the "laws of nature". It's retarded. The opposition to Darwin were catastrophists. They stated that catastrophic events played a significant role in shaping our Earth along with the life which resides here. Everywhere, we see observe evidence of catastrophes of epic proportions. They are by and large ignored and the best "theories" that uniformitarians have come up with are "Ice Ages" and "Climate change" and "HUNDREDS of MILLIONS of years". Almost forgot, "Gravity" halped, cause Mike teddy Pendergrass Tyson said so.
Also, did I mention that a comet or asteroid is what killed the dinosaurs, maybe. But… Isn't that a catastrophe. Yes. Yes, it is. That's an example of catastrophic event that would have discredited Darwin's theories of "Evolution". Which, by the way, we don't have actual "proof" that the dinosaurs were actually killed by a comet or asteroid. That, too, is just a "theory", at best. One the uniformitarians had to accept as possible, because they see comets and asteroid, now, today, so that's the only thing they can think of. However, the dinosaurs were not the only ones to succumb to mass extinctions, and the clue lies in what we see immediately following these natural disasters.
Rapid changes in the biological world always appear right after each of these major extinction events. Our DNA has the ability to sense changes in the environment and to adapt within one's own lifetime. It doesn't take hundreds of generations or random mutation and "selective" mating. The catastrophes help explain the rapid mutations, as lifeforms would be exposed to intense levels of Electromagnetic radiation which we do not observe anything remotely close that scale today, here on Earth now.
Also, I'd like to point out that no explanation has been given to what actually caused the supposed "ice ages" that uniformitarians suggested. Technically, the "best" they've come up with is "climate change" due to "greenhouse gasses", which, again, is bull shit. They came up with that "theory" to try to explain why Venus was so hot, when they previously said Venus was cool because of it's cloud cover. Velikovsky predicted Venus MUST be hot, because he was basing his ideology on the observations of our ancestors. Which means that while uniformitarians will never be able to "prove" MILLIONS of years of observation, catastrophists actually have written accounts of at least some of the events that shaped our planet and gave us the abundance of Life we still observe to this very day.