9585800 LB
RULE 48
what they are arguing over
https://www.lawfareblog.com/shoddy-history-behind-key-precedent-flynn-case
some Harvard cocksucker wrote up an opinion that twisted some obscure rule to drag this out
the DNC does something wackier to divide the country more.
"FLAG DAY is holiday that represents the worse of America" Nancy Pelosi with Oprah shitting on her head and Rep Clyburn playing her tits like bongos
or dragging out more and more to get more eyes on his final acquittal.
< <<<<<<<<<<<<<this is the final judge who will preside over the case.
lots of articles online leading to this today.
summaries of Rinaldi vs UD; Rule 48; US vs Fokker.
Rinaldi vs US
In 1977, in Rinaldi v. United States, the Supreme Court addressed a district court’s decision to deny a Rule 48(a) motion. The defendant, who had been convicted of robbery in state court, was tried and convicted for offenses arising out of the same robbery in federal court. The Justice Department filed a Rule 48(a) motion to dismiss the federal charges, but the district court refused to give leave of the court because, the judge wrote, the prosecutor had acted in bad faith by misrepresenting his original authorization from the Justice Department to file charges.
rule 48
In 2016, the D.C. Circuit reemphasized that a district court reviews a Rule 48(a) motion “primarily” to protect a defendant from dismissals that are part of a scheme of prosecutorial harassment to repeatedly bring and then dismiss charges.
US vs Fokker
The D.C. Circuit decision, U.S. v. Fokker Services, concerned whether a district court could properly deny a motion to delay a trial under the Speedy Trial Act’s exception for deferred prosecution agreements between the parties “with the approval of the court” because it concluded that the deferred prosecution agreement at issue was too lenient.
https://www.lawfareblog.com/justice-department-wants-drop-flynns-case-can-judge-say-no