Wilkins is trying to use police brutality/racism in his analogies. What a fucking asshole.
HOW THE FUCK can Wilkins ask that question..is it proper? DOESN'T FUCKING MATTER ASSHOLE IT"S THE PROSECUTIONS PREROGATIVE.
Mother fucking hell
True, but trying to bring race and police brutality against blacks into the case is going far beyond that.
Well not a lawfag, but this is a hearing not a trial. I think all parties can make whatever arguments they wish. If it's irrelevant, then government's attorney or Powell can make that case.
Here's Wilkins…anyone surprised?
Expect Wilkins to go silent from hear on out.
Wisenberg's take
https://twitter.com/WisenbergSol/status/1271451476615979009
Flynn can talk.
Sullivan's attorney: there is adversarial relationship despite the government not being an adversary, because the judge appointed adversaries w/ amicus. And this upholds regular order.
gag order
It's a hearing, not a trial. If they believe something is irrelevant, they can make that in their argument.