>>9588887

not trying to start shit again but just want to apologize to magaveli if he/she is around. my pastes are being deleted too. everything from the past 3 days is gone. we need to do something about this. i'm sorry for immediately jumping to the conclusion that it was baker fuckery. this is real. pastebin is deleting our dough..

>>9589001

didn't mean to crop out my pastebin name. in the spirit of transparency, here it is.

it looks like we might have to move to another site..

anons, what do you think?

>>9589069

thanks, anon. i think we should choose from one of those/make a decision we can all follow for uniformity (i will go wherever anons tell me to go). i have no familiarity with those sites and it will definitely take getting used to but we can't allow our dough to keep getting deleted.

>>9589100

well that's really fucked up considering all the hours of unpaid work we do here keeping this 24/7/365 conversation going while you shitpost at your leisure but everyone is entitled to their opinion.

>>9589092

this looks closer to pastebin so i'm ok with moving here.

>>9589139

did not see those posts, thanks for bringing them to my attention.

>your evil trips they curesed your pastes

kek, i guess they did

also don't call me AB, kek. we already have(had?) an ab in astrobaker

>>9589158

good fucking question, definitely worth a dig.

>>9589183

maybe someone can start archiving the dough right after it's posted? would be too annoying for bakers, idk. i don't think there's a way to recover it. but it doesn't really matter, functionally speaking, unless there is something wrong with the dough and we need to go back to the last time it was right OR if pastebin deletes them soon after they are posted (as has been happening) which makes it impossible for the next baker to bake…

we just need to move.

>>9589211

they have been deleted between 200-400 posts after they've been posted, according to magaveli.

>>9589233 Proof that Pastebin has deleted "spam" pastes in the past

notable

also i think we should make the pastebin issue a global notable

>>9589243

read my mind, see

>>9589250

also, i'd be ok with removing the scarborough dig for now. it should have its own thread, if it doesn't already, and added to "other threads", imo.

>>9589227

smart.. i've never done that.

>>9589222

not a bad idea, if someone is willing and able to do it.

>>9589201

>bakers don't do fuckery

idk, baker - all due respect but there has been fuckery in the past.

>Bakers should always have raw paste in note++

yep, archive offline needs to apply to dough too. i should've been doing this from the start.

--

>>9589254 Pastebin dig from April: Changes at Pastebin have security researchers red in the face

notable

>>9589329

>>9589430

>>9589570

>need to find out if they are REALLY deleting posts

kek, doesn't matter why they're doing it. the fact that they're doing it harms our ability to keep this operation going.

>>9589622

digs here:

>>9589254

>>9589233

and i understand, i was skeptical until it happened to me. i'm ok with bakers waiting til it happens to them before they proceed. i am not in favor of buying a pro account, but will do it if that's the general consensus.

>Suppose it's a tech issue, mistake or attack?

rather naive, don't you think? this is the most attacked site on the internet.

>>9589678

yea, so fuck pastebin then. (as comfy as it is, compared to others - this is not sustainable.)