I agree. I wouldn't either.
That would have to be a pretty big toilet.
Never seen a double-wide commode before.
Must be a European thing.
Unless you sat on top of each other..
Either way, fuck that shit.
Which could get messy.
Anyone else notice like 85% of Q-related Twitter accounts female?
That doesn't seem right.
Are 85% of Anons female?
Based on the language used and themes spoken about here, I would say it's more like 85% male.
Using the female image has long been a bait tactic. There are limitless examples of this.
The strangle hold on truth sharing is real.
Blurring the boundaries of reality is a great way to make it disappear..
..
are female*
I'm not asking anyone here for any revealing information.
That's not the point.
You're gonna make me explain this?
The point was that if it's really a majority of females here, great, fine. No qualms-
But if that's the case, most of you ladies do a great acting job on this site.
I was talking about Twitter.
There's a few scenarios that can be true:
-
A vast percentage of Pro-Q Twitter accounts are pretending to be female, using pseudonyms and photos and describing themselves as female in their profiles
-
A vast percentage of Pro-Q Twitter accounts are owned/operated by females
-
The image of female participation in the Great Awakening on Twitter is bait to attract people fond of that to interact with their accounts.
Given the evidence we see on this board every single day, I'd say #3 is the most plausible.
Overall, it struck me as odd, one of those Be careful who you follow moments, and I thought I'd see what Anons thought.
No offense intended.
This could easily be a #4 for above.
That's why I'm bringing it up.
(btw 85% was just a number I threw out, you obv get that, but just clarifying)
—
Also didn't mean to start a fuckin fire with my rather obvious observation.
<3 you all.
Just noting because shills exist everywhere, especially on social media.