dChan
Anonymous ID: 06e7ff June 12, 2020, 10:17 p.m. No.9594351   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4386

>>9594199 pb

 

Democrats acting like really really crazy people is going to make people who don't like Trump vote for Trump.

 

Seriously, how many GOP are there in Seattle? How many people in Seattle actually like the fact that the mayor is actually allowing a section of the city to become lawless?

 

There aren't going to be many people in Seattle who say "well, I like Trump, but rapes are up, and there was a big shortage of rapes, so, I'm going with the Dems this year, because I'm hopeful that Biden will increase the number of lawless rape towns."

 

It's not like this is actually anarchy, either. We can't legally kill Soros or Gates or whoever is pissing us off at the moment. Those things remain illegal. There's just a mind boggling lack of law enforcement in a handful of cities. And most people - even a lot of Democrats - don't like that lawlessness - especially when it's not anarchy, it's just government not doing their job.

Anonymous ID: 06e7ff June 12, 2020, 10:31 p.m. No.9594460   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4979

>>9594191 pb

 

Ok, sure. I'm not going to argue against the possibility that you're 100% right about all that.

 

However, what I'm talking about is basically conventional science.

 

You know, how the glaciers covered the Northeast of the United States down to Long Island about 20K years ago. Conventional science. I call it "the ice age" because that's what it's called.

 

I'm not going to say that 1 Million years ago the world wasn't covered with a civilization more advanced than the one we have now, but bad vaccines and gmo crops and nasty chemicals killed everyone 1 Million years ago. Maybe.

 

But you're acting like quite the asshole when what I'm talking about is conventional mainstream science. It's very well believed that glaciers covered the NE of the US 20K years ago, and they call that the ice age. Am I wrong about this? I'm pretty sure that I'm right.

 

You have an alternative theory. Maybe you're right. But you have nothing to support that, and nothing to attack the conventional wisdom except a general theory about how people lie.

Anonymous ID: 06e7ff June 12, 2020, 10:47 p.m. No.9594594   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4612 >>4669

 

Hey, fucking asshole, I'm simply repeating the conventional wisdom.

 

The conventional wisdom says that the Northeast of the United States was covered with glaciers 20K thousand years ago. They call that the ice age. Conventional science.

 

And you decide to insult people because they don't agree with your version of events, which is not shared by very many.

 

I don't fucking know and neither do you, but I'm talking about shit that there is general agreement on.

 

Yeah, there was a hammer in coal, and coal takes a long time to form, and that must mean that people had hammers a half a million years ago. But maybe not. There are anomalies out there.

 

But there's general agreement that there were glaciers in the NE of the US 20K years ago, and they call that the ice age.

 

So, when you're going to pull something out of your ass, you might not want to attack what is considered normal science by almost everybody.

 

I get it, you have a different version of reality, shared by few.

 

>>9594289 pb

Anonymous ID: 06e7ff June 12, 2020, 10:52 p.m. No.9594639   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4663

>>9594386

 

 

>Democrats acting like really really crazy people

 

is what I said.

 

There are a lot of slightly different ways to describe what the Democrats are doing. It doesn't really matter what the wording is, even many Democrats aren't liking what the Democrat mayors and governors are doing.

Anonymous ID: 06e7ff June 12, 2020, 11 p.m. No.9594711   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>9594612

 

whatever dude, I think that we're all familiar with the general fact that conventional science and conventional religion don't have matching timelines. I think we all know that conventional science is nowhere near conventional religion in terms of number of years.

 

I wasn't asking to get into a debate, I do think that we should all be able to understand what basic conventional science tells us - whether you think it's right or wrong.

 

How about this, we live in a Matrix and Trump isn't President? Maybe I'm right. But lets just assume that I'm wrong, and that we don't live in a Matrix, and Trump is the President. This message board requires that some assumptions be made.

Anonymous ID: 06e7ff June 12, 2020, 11:36 p.m. No.9595006   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5045

>>9594979

>Is this conventional science based on facts or beliefs?

 

It's based on CONVENTION.

 

I'm not having this argument. I'm simply saying that this is CONVENTION.

 

Let's just agree that it's CONVENTION, and leave it at that. I said at least a couple of times that you may be right. But let's just give CONVENTION it's due, and not attack people for expressing a well known CONVENTION.

 

What you should be doing is finding the link to support your ideas, and not asking me fucking questions.