>>9595295

The thing is, that you take Q as a signature, when in fact, it is something what connects everything.

Coup = Q, the same way shills tried to put Cube = Q as a distraction.

Makes you wonder right? Take for example Tom Fitton: "I'm not Q". Do you think he don't know about this "Q" movement? Do you think that by saying "I'm not Q" Tom doesn't understand that he is loosing "views" just because people tend to follow this movement?

>I am not trying to divide this movement, I am just thinking outside the box

It is easy to label this movement as "conspiracy" because of the single letter, when in fact, it is just couPresearch

>>9595482

>Take thousands of people who pretty much agree on most things

Then organize the referendum and fire some corrupt politicians. Or you forgot how to play?

>>9595623

>>9595623

What do you think "UNITED PEOPLE HAVE ALL THE POWER" means? What steps you must compleate to start referendums?

First: You all have to agree on 1 question.

Second: You have to gather signatures (e-signature suits well).

Third: When this is done, GOVERMENT starts VOTING.

Fourth: YOU VOTE ON THE REFERENDUM QUESTION.

FIVE: THERE IS NO STEP FIVE.

With Trump as a POTUS, you can do incredible things.

And about a movie? SPOILER ALERT: You have their playbook.

>>9595733

lel