Anonymous ID: 7bd2a9 June 13, 2020, 9:58 a.m. No.9598377   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>9598362

there is no Democratic party, it's a drug and sex cult and they are run by a very few, who are controlled by Chinese cash and cabal assests.

they are thin and almost very few.

 

the CHAZ are those who thought these people would help them, spazzing out because they realize that isn't going to ahppen, meanwhile they are being gaslighted into thinking that there is wide approval for it, and all they really want is a stake in life, and people to care for them even when they go nuts for a while.

but they keep stabbing at those who love them, till there is no more patience.

Anonymous ID: 7bd2a9 June 13, 2020, 10:35 a.m. No.9598612   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8641 >>8651 >>8720

so the shills today are doing a 'maya dates are wrong' slide.

what if they knew that Quazta-chee-tall was an Irish guy?

I mean, what ancient Mexican had a big red beard.

so that means he was a Christian.

and that also means that the Mayan calander is about Christianity.

 

would they be so hot on their theories then.

 

I do give that a full moon on a solstice is kind of an interesting event.

and that it's also an ecclipse, that's cools too.

what does that do to magnetic alignments?

what does the magetic field model show us?

 

wait, they pretend like there isn't one, even though you know that they have one that htey dont' share.

Anonymous ID: 7bd2a9 June 13, 2020, 10:39 a.m. No.9598651   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8677

>>9598612

if shills want me to believe that there is some kind of magical magnetic happening going on, then show that this ecclipse happens regularly and how it plays out over the very long 28 000 year procession of the equinox cycle, and the cylce of the moon running high and low along the eccliptic. Are they actually related? or do the two cycles, the long 28 Thousand year one, and the 18 year moon cycle, and the even long ecclipse cycle, how are they coorelated over the 28 thousand years, and is there an even longer cycle when those two repeat (that would be orders of magnitude longer.

 

the olmec heads are much older, supposedly, than the Maya., aren't tehy?

but how does one carbon date old stone?

 

>>9598641

Anonymous ID: 7bd2a9 June 13, 2020, 10:44 a.m. No.9598689   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

just in case anyone is offended by my talk about the Mayan calender perhaps also being a symbol of christianity, in fact it is billed by archiologists as having been around pre Jesus Christ so . . .

 

that would have to mean that the Spirit of Christ

renewed the face of the whole earth

long before humans were aware, and He is known by many names so . . .

Mayan Calander is an awesome and very important historical concept. Do not the ancient Eygptians have the same calander?

how are bricks in Copal so . . . European looking?

 

perhaps there has been more contact than many people will admit.

Anonymous ID: 7bd2a9 June 13, 2020, 10:46 a.m. No.9598698   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>9598692

"don't worry, sweetness, even though your mom said we could never meet, I'm coming to get you and you can ride on the back, and I'll bring you to Grammas like you always wanted to. She's always wanted to meet you."

Anonymous ID: 7bd2a9 June 13, 2020, 10:52 a.m. No.9598760   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>9598743

usurpatoin of useful items that the ones who use these as 'symbols' probably don't even know how to use.

USURPATION of useful item and conflation.

 

that's that .

youngsters: all four of those tools are important and part of Human history and existed long long before the braind-dead-tocracy of the trust-fund marxists started their scheme into tricking children into self-destructive rage-dances every so many generations.

Anonymous ID: 7bd2a9 June 13, 2020, 11:07 a.m. No.9598879   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8966

>>9598774

I see about 7 or 8 different visages in your images.

so I don't think they are spirits, but ideas of spirits.

or people.

so then you say 'us'

 

I have no answers I am not the one you should be asking about who these images represent.

and you understand that these are not spirits, but images of art, correct? of course you do.