>>9608150 pb

>Judge Wants Flynn Case in Limbo Until Political Pressure Can Intervene

Each of the three corrupt DC appellate judges has now stated publicly, and been recorded doing so, that the goals of both their decisions and expressed support for crooked judge sullivan's approach is entirely political, not judicial. They also recognized that judge sullivan's decisions are also entirely political, not judicial.

All four judges have essentially indicted themselves for deprivation of rights under color of law.

They really believe they are untouchable. If they were bribed into doing so, even by a foreign power (directly or indirectly) they may be looking at life in prison or the death penalty.

https://www.justice.gov/crt/deprivation-rights-under-color-law

"The offense is punishable by a range of imprisonment up to a life term, or the death penalty, depending upon the circumstances of the crime, and the resulting injury, if any."

The New York lawyers who firebombed police cars were shocked this month when they realized they were facing life in prison.

Hopefully these four crooked judges find themselves in the same situation soon.

>>9609784

>>9609791

>>9609771

Removing from a case can be as simple as higher judges deciding to remove them. A Writ of Mandamus can result that way.

From the corrupt judges' discussion on Friday, they plan to vote 3-0 against Flynn, the US DoJ and the Solicitor General - in essence claiming unconstitutional authority that both their own court and the US Supreme Court rejected in recent decisions.

Otherwise, these options exist:

1) US Senate impeachment and conviction; or

2) disbarment (a state bar association proceeding); or

3) federal or state indictment and conviction that results in imprisonment; or

4) military tribunal conviction for sedition or treason and life in prison or judicial execution.

>>9609784

Obama's White House website actually stated simply that what these four corrupt judges are now doing is unconstitutional. See below.

Also, Congress may at any point choose to restructure the courts and redefine their authority. The branches are equal. The courts do not sit above the other two branches.

"The courts only try actual cases and controversies — a party must show that it has been harmed in order to bring suit in court."

https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/1600/judicial-branch

"Article III of the Constitution, which establishes the Judicial Branch, leaves Congress significant discretion to determine the shape and structure of the federal judiciary. Even the number of Supreme Court Justices is left to Congress — at times there have been as few as six, while the current number (nine, with one Chief Justice and eight Associate Justices) has only been in place since 1869. The Constitution also grants Congress the power to establish courts inferior to the Supreme Court, and to that end Congress has established the United States district courts, which try most federal cases, and 13 United States courts of appeals, which review appealed district court cases.

Federal judges can only be removed through impeachment by the House of Representatives and conviction in the Senate. Judges and justices serve no fixed term — they serve until their death, retirement, or conviction by the Senate. By design, this insulates them from the temporary passions of the public, and allows them to apply the law with only justice in mind, and not electoral or political concerns.

Generally, Congress determines the jurisdiction of the federal courts. In some cases, however — such as in the example of a dispute between two or more U.S. states — the Constitution grants the Supreme Court original jurisdiction, an authority that cannot be stripped by Congress.

The courts only try actual cases and controversies — a party must show that it has been harmed in order to bring suit in court. This means that the courts do not issue advisory opinions on the constitutionality of laws or the legality of actions if the ruling would have no practical effect. Cases brought before the judiciary typically proceed from district court to appellate court and may even end at the Supreme Court, although the Supreme Court hears comparatively few cases each year."

>>9609771

the judges stated that they wanted to delay any decision against crooked judge sullivan until a political change occurred that would cause the DoJ to continue falsely to prosecute a man innocent of any crime, purely for political purposes.

as mccabe stated plainly, this entire strategy was motivated by sedition, "First we fuck Flynn, then we fuck Trump."

the only goal ever was to illegitimately unseat a duly elected president.

it's simply put, treason.