>>9608699 pb
That was done on 9/11
"planes hitting the towers" over and over and over for 3 days or so.
Also based on a CGI images.
Been there, done that.
They've tried it out already & it worked.
The Networks needed to be arrested 19 years ago!
No the CGI "planes" are right out in the open. The proof is in the tapes that were shown - many people likely still have copies.
I not certain at all about the dustification of the Towers being CGI 100%
Some images may have been altered to muddy the water?
The man promoting that is a definite shill
You don't have to over-reach and go that far. It's already proved in a very simple way.
And POTUS DJT saw it before anyone else, known.
HAPPY BIRTHDAY DJT
GET THEM
The man who promotes "the Towers were empty" "no one died" and "The Towers falling were 100% CGI too" {false] ?
is a nasty shill "Simon Shack" whose brother is connected with the bin Ladin family
You can keep it very simple
Newton's "law" of Nature
And also other thinkers of long ago:
"Two objects can not be in the same place at the same time"
Keep it simple
They want you to over-reach so everything gets discredited at once, or at least that it all becomes confusing
Stick with the best evidence.
(The CGI on the Towers was likely placed there later, must harder to see, if it is there at all (it only shows in certain samples)
SS is a European shill who created a nasty cult around the subject.
He came out wit the first and best video serier on the subject.
Then made a sharp left turn and created a cult.
They love cartoons though.
The corruption of the researcher movement is a different subject.
what are you referring to?
that too..
And the tips of the wings.
Could never cut steel before breaking off
There's also a wide angle from a heli which doesn't show a plane where one should be , in the distance flying in.