Anonymous ID: 4e4eb9 June 14, 2020, 5:41 a.m. No.9610023   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0051

>>9610006

>helps immune deficient people

That argument itself doesn't make sense, because vaccines are supposed to just stop getting sick from something, vaccinated people can still spread the "viruses", they are just supposed to not get sick from it.

 

Were all these immune deficient people vaccinated before getting these immune system problems?

Anonymous ID: 4e4eb9 June 14, 2020, 6:42 a.m. No.9610381   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>9610354

>Why is it OK for niggers to use the word NIGGER in public??

>And if an Asian calls a NIGGER A Nigger, it's out bounds?

That's because the ones that are telling you that are in fact racists, anon.

Anonymous ID: 4e4eb9 June 14, 2020, 7:06 a.m. No.9610574   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0589 >>0647

>>9610538

(Some) black people are waking up, this step is very important.

 

Look at that "independent zone".

What's better?

Stop it immediately by brutal force, or let it go on so that people SEE that it doesn't work and it turns to even more crap.

 

It's better to let brainwashed leftists do what they want, see that it fails, so at least some of them wake up to the nonsense and reject it.

 

It's basically like letting a child do something very stupid.

Anonymous ID: 4e4eb9 June 14, 2020, 7:12 a.m. No.9610602   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0651

>>9610572

>it was an anon question

You sure?

All sorts of these questions were written in a certain way so that you can put different meanings into them.

Some questions were also not properly answered.

 

For example:

Did NASA fake the moon landings? Have we been to the moon since then? Are there secret space programs? Is this why the Space Force was created?

 

"False."

 

False, what?

Which question got answered here?

 

And the headline - AS ALWAYS - misdirects.

"The Moon Landings Are Real; Space Programs Exist Outside of Public Domain"

 

>>9610589

Q2476

Sometimes people need to see the future in order to save the past.

Anonymous ID: 4e4eb9 June 14, 2020, 7:20 a.m. No.9610652   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0665

>>9610612

Very good question, anon.

Very good question.

 

The victim count seems to be one of the special numbers.

 

>>9610605

When you start at WTC7 and use logic on that, in the end that's what comes out of it.

When you understand that it had to happen on exactly that day, that it was controlled demolitions, that so much depended on it working out, WHY THE HELL WOULD YOU USE ACTUAL PLANES.

Way too much risk in it, even or especially when you would use remote control.

Why would you put controlled actors at the site that are repeating and repeating the same story over and over.

You wouldn't use planes in such event.