I want to delve into something that might seem arcane right now. Glyphosate herbicide is ubiquitous, but likely extremely harmful. Monsanto/Bayer is taking tremendous flak for the product.

Parents seeking help for their sometimes extremely ill autistic children have apparently been interested in using MMS (chlorine dioxide). One hypothesis about the effectiveness of chlorine dioxide is that it helps break down glyphosate in human cells. The very thought of glyphosate being this persistent or getting incorporated into human proteins is, of course, anathema to Big Ag and Big Pharma (vaccines are contaminated with glyphosate).

Stephanie Seneff is a MIT researcher who has heavily delved into this subject. She recently (last year) commented on a research study that apparently showed glyphosate is not incorporated into the proteins of actively dividing human cells. She reached the startling conclusion that the data presented showed that glyphosate WAS incorporated into human proteins, suggesting to me that the authors of the paper wanted to get their data in to the public realm, even if it meant disguising their information with an apparently false conclusion.

http://people.csail.mit.edu/seneff/does_glyphosate_substitute.html