I noticed something interesting about the way (they) approach propping someone up as a victim in the news.

It works like an ECLIPSE.

Not only does this relate to their “holiday” on June 21st (solar eclipse scheduled for that same day), it also relates to occult symbolism and the way that “magic” tricks psychologically work on a person.

All “magic” (re: sleight of hand) is an ILLUSION. It’s about misdirection and ignorance. No magic actually occurs. By looking here instead of there, you don’t see what really happened, so you are tricked into thinking that some sort of “magic” occurred. Thus the very fitting term: magic trick. It’s a trick and the whole “trick” rests in the observer’s ignorance.

In an eclipse, the fullness of a celestial body is covered by another celestial body or a shadow, thus obscuring it (darkness = ignorance). Light (a symbol for knowledge) only makes it through around the edges. When an eclipse occurs, you see only a fraction of the light that you’d normally see.

In the MSM, we see the regular use of something called a false dichotomy. A false dichotomy is when you’re given two options and told that they’re the only options, when in reality there are many more options available. This is an informational eclipse.

One popular way that they employ this trick is in regards to the victim/perpetrator dichotomy. According to (them), someone is either a victim or a perpetrator, but not both. This plays out in the MSM by people being declared “victim” or “perpetrator” and then having the details of their life eclipsed accordingly.

A “victim” has their life eclipsed to exclude any negative details; a “perpetrator” has their life eclipsed to exclude any positive details. At the end, you are left with people who are either pure sinners or pure saints. It’s a bit like a psychological funhouse mirror in terms of how skewed and unrealistic it is.

Just knowing this is important. Once you understand a magic trick, you can spot it in action. Then the “magic” is gone.

(They) have used informational eclipsing for long enough to reasonably assume that it will work. What if the racial division was only part of the reason for highlighting the George Floyd event? What if the other reason for it was to eclipse his criminal history, which they could assume would be hidden once they declare him a “victim”? What if that was deliberate because of the connections that Floyd has? Anons have since discovered that the club he worked at was shady, he was caught with a fake $20 bill, then there’s the connection to Obama’s mother… It’s a deep rabbit hole which nobody is allowed to speak about openly now because of him being declared a “victim” and thus having all the negative details of his life eclipsed. Many people have been looking at his connection to masons and racial tension as the aim. But, what if it’s also about hiding his past and his connections? What if there’s a similar trend in other “victims”? A man was killed in Atlanta the other day at a traffic stop after getting into a brawl with a cop and stealing the cop’s taser and firing at him. He had a record, supposedly, of child abuse and false imprisonment. (Link to the rap sheet another Anon provided (needs confirmation): [https://www.rapsheetz.com/georgia/doc-prisoner/BROOKS_RAYSHARD/1001370147] )

If you had an international group of child predators, you’d probably need money laundering (Floyd: fake bills, club to launder through), you’d need people to procure the children (Brooks: false imprisonment), and who are sickos themselves who don’t care about children being abused (Brooks: child abuse)?

They do like to humiliate the masses, don’t they? What better way to do that than to convince us to prop up monsters? And, if you can accomplish racial division, rioting, and covering your own tracks at the same time, why not?