>>9614694
>Has anyone wondered why these corrupt people always seem to place so called, "scientific experts," on a pedestal?
Science has become a new religion. No fucking joke. The replaced "God" with "science" and viola!
>Scientism
The main problem I have is not science, but rather the beliefs of "science". Where children are taught "science" based not on factual evidence, but rather fictional speculation. Several concepts being taught to children are directly opposed to scripture. This was by design. Meant to deteriorate the structure of our civilized society. They teach kids that we are the best ever, and our ancestors were just stupid apes. Obviously, right? I mean we has "smart" phones now! The only problem is, the second the power or internet goes out, no one knows WTF to do anymore, cause we can't just google shit or whatever.
Problem is there a numerous contradictions to what "science" says. Things like "the big bang" were invented to oppose the idea of "God" creating the Universe. One major problem is that "theory" contradicts virtually all observable evidence, and has no proof to support itself. However, because "science" believes this to be "true", they teach it to kids early in their stages of mental development where they cannot differentiate between fact or fiction. Kids are told to believe this, too, and if they oppose the ideology, they will likely fail the class. They are rewarded for repeating the "acceptable" answer, even if it contradicts the very nature of reality, yet they are punished should they decide to be advanced critical thinkers. Teachers will lose their jobs if they decide to teach outside of the curriculum. And pretty much, by now, those who are all teaching the fields have now accepted these beliefs to be "true", because "smart" people of "science" said so. It's not cool at all…
Every religious person in this Country needs to become aware of this, because each and everyone of us are entitled to redress, per First Amendment. We need to do this. I'm not a lone crazy. There are respectable people who are aware of the flaws in "science". And because of the internet, they've been able to reach many others, outside the standard ranks of command of the "scientific community". Evolution wasn't forced into curriculum until the 1960's, but even then it was not unopposed. It was a comped court that made the ruling, and "publishers" who chose to favor one ideology over the other. When you lay all the facts on the table, it's fairly evident that Darwinism was wrong, on many levels. However, by making his ideology the de facto standard, while glorifying him as a "genius", it's become a "prove him wrong" approach ever since. His "theories" were not designed to be "provable", rather the opposite. By stretching out the timeline to MILLIONS of years, we would never had adequate time to observe this level of gradualism. And by pushing several things back in time so far, the create a certain level of separation that prevents the observer from ever fully understanding the root cause of what caused whatever else to occur. We have "data", but it gets interpreted by people who are approaching it with predispositions in mind. Opposing contradictions will then get discarded as "wrong" or "anomalies", because they'd have to rewrite all that we've thought "science" "knew". And that just isn't a good look for "science", so you either go along with the de facto standards, or your funding gets cut, and your name gets slandered and ridiculed by "science".