Anonymous ID: 035f73 June 14, 2020, 5:06 p.m. No.9615477   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>9615367 l/b

Thanks for letting me know.

Anons, posted late l/b:

Experience in your particular geographic area?

I'm considering that the Lockdown hoax has been used to remove a percentage of our population whose number is not known at the present hour.

I'm in CA and have been working from the first mention of the Chinese Virus.

I'm still struck by the deep cuts in the number of members of the public I encounter each day.

I don't live in a rural area, but a densely populated suburb of the Bay Area.

To make matters even more odd, the county took the weeks/months preceding the virus to explicitly inform the public that the homeless encampments in our area would be cleared in order to engage in necessary

clean-ups for the health of the inhabitants.

I had seen some of the same individuals for 20+ years, and 99% of them are just gone now.

It's not just homeless individuals though.

My circle of working, shopping and such is about 5-6 cities. (Not sure of the square mileage.

So, is it that far-fetched to believe that a first harvest of sorts (a la the Rosicrutians/Cabal) has indeed already occurred?

CGI/Deepfakes digitally enhancing the population in media with riots and looting, while removing people physically?

I feel something "missing".

There's a pervasive emptiness.

Is this the "how" Q spoke about?

Anonymous ID: 035f73 June 14, 2020, 5:23 p.m. No.9615639   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>9615454

Appreciate your input fren.

Would it be possible that all the energies we as individuals release into the collective consciousness with both positive and negative aspects have been deeply diminished by lack of physical space being shared?

Although my attendance to both Arts and Athletics were voluntarily scaled back at least 95% in the last decade (more for my own safety concerns of large gatherings), I realize the actual energies a group of people can emit.

Just wondering if it is this that I'm sensing as you kindly eluded to.

Anonymous ID: 035f73 June 14, 2020, 5:35 p.m. No.9615777   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>9615644

So instead of MItt's tying the family dog to the car roof story, we see corporate media again try to attach the death of POTUS's alcoholic brother to him not being there for him.

A "tough love" sentiment carried out by a brother that costs him his life.

This will backfire spectacularly.

TRUMP LANDSLIDE 2020!!!