>>9615359 (pb)
>you're here because you want to be proven wrong. that should tell you something about yourself
It's the empirical way of strenghtening a hypothesis; if it can't be proven wrong, you're more likely right than wrong.
>it's also very telling that you admitted you enjoy being a predator
Read again: I said it's logical that Predators rule this earth, because most of the people are weak prey.
>Predators have ruled this earth for far too long and that is changing every day, as we speak
Predators will rule over prey until the end of ages. Only by becoming a predator, will you be able to overcome the predators.
>I hope your fantasy teenage girlfriend leaves you for someone her own age
If she does, I'll find a new one. No harm done. There's this lovely 17-year old living down the street here.
>you sick fuck.
Again, calling me names weakens your argument. It makes you look stupid that you have to think of insults to gain the upper hand in the argument. It's an ad hominem.
>you think everything you're saying is fact-based and not reliant on your sick opinions?
It is, actually. I have many facts to back up my claims.
>Did i hurt your feelings, sweetie?
Peak oof, honey. The further down this argument we go, the more emotional and personal and less rational and objective you become.
I'll play your game, just to show you how equal I am in relationships with women.
This is what I think you are: You argue from a place of envy: you're not a young woman anymore and subsequently get less attention than you got when you were younger. Instead of gracefully accepting your decay and granting young girls to get the attention you enjoyed so much when you were that age, you sabotage the situation and make these girls off-limits for men. This forces the men to give you more attention, because they can't give any more attention to younger girls.
>>9615357 (pb)
Yeh, my bad. I misread that.
You'd still make a good wife, kek.