https://twitter.com/ABC/status/1272607024195309568

ABC News

@ABC

MORE: After reviewing new information from large clinical trials, the agency now believes that the suggested dosing regimens "are unlikely to produce an antiviral effect," FDA chief scientist Denise Hinton said in a letter announcing the decision.

>Q !CbboFOtcZs ID: f240d5 No.1952583

>Jun 28 2018 23:18:21 (EST)

>We are waiting for a reporter to ask the ultimate question.

>What are they waiting for?

>They can end this at any time simply by asking POTUS, right?

>We may have to ‘force’ this one.

>Q

Not trying to be a cynical asshole, but are you guys really going to let the DS pull a COVID-19 2.0 on the public with the only drug touted by @POTUS and shown to work by doctors worldwide, unavailable as treatment? Just trying to understand the play, here. The riots are a sticky situation, so I get the stalemate there (to an extent). But seriously? There are still people wearing masks at the store and this narrative (actual virus to some) is going to hit again before the election.

Are we going to just roll with it like last time?

>>9623324

That's fantastic. Now when a Dr. goes to prescribe it and cannot use the term "off label for sore eyeballs" or "off label for crooked toenails", and instead has to declare the patient has Lupus or Malaria in order to get it filled, what do we do then?

>>9623313

I'm glad that some doctors are fighting back. I really am. My question was more geared towards those in a position to potentially do something about the criminals in all our important orgs that dictate what we can/cannot put into our bodies.