People have been theorizing that George Floyd is really alive and impersonating his brother or lookalike.
FYI, identical twins have different fingerprints, even though their DNA is identical. If any Anon comes across this guy and manages to get his prints on something, if they are run (if Anon is PI/LEO) and it really is GF, the prints will match (so long as they weren't changed in the system's records, though depending on the jurisdiction, there may be a hard copy on file somewhere).
Just a thought. You ever notice how there are so many trans cabal members? Ever notice how they all say: "I identify as…" in exactly the same words? Maybe it's like an incantation for them? Maybe the same with: "My pronouns are…" That sort of repetition is also used in incantations/prayers in certain religions. It's just a thought I had because of the cabal+occult connection, plus the strangeness of them always using the exact same words (What are the odds?).
Aren't we past that by now? Isn't the question: Who ALREADY dumped gallons of LSD on them?
Eew…
Just have a bunch of twitching jaws left on the street in a damn bloody mess afterwards…
Creepy.
MSM or anything by a liberal author or feminist is pretty word-salady… Though I can't imagine who would want to rot their brain like that.
They're liberals. That would be a giant STD-ridden orgy, filled with tramp stamps and people with unidentified genders. It would be like watching porn on a bad acid trip.
I have a theory that they wanted to remove God from schools because you can't take God's throne with God sitting on it. They remove God, then take the throne themselves. You can also see this act of playing God in the form of transgenderism really clearly. God creates man and woman. Then, [they] come along and claim to have done the same, they just claim they created a man out of a woman and a woman out of a man. But, they haven't. They're just poor, sad, mutilated people who haven't actually changed sexes. It's a devastating lie. It's also a clear attempt to usurp God, or even if someone doesn't believe in God, it's clear that they're playing with the laws of nature by trying to change the born sex of men and women.
They do this in a lot of other ways. Remaking language to change the meaning of "man" and "woman," "he" and "she," is just part of this. If you are religious, it comes back to "the word" being of God. If you're not, language is still a way to deeply manipulate people. Both Hannah Arendt noted this on her coverage of totalitarian systems as well as Orwell in his essay on the English language, re: propaganda.
Never heard that before. Do you have any documents relating to it? It does sound like negative reinforcement at a developmental age and could certainly cause an issue with personality formation. If you have any documents on it, do share, though. Researching medicine/psychology is part of what I do.
Thanks! I agree that it can be a positive thing. How one deals with language can either make or break a person. This goes back to scriptures written about philosophy thousands of years ago that I've read. It's not just in the Bible. It's in Eastern religion/philosophy as well. It's an understanding of the whole human species, not simply one group or another.
One of the biggest risks is giving away ground in this. Allowing for the change of the definition of: man, woman, he, she, to refer to cross-sex people is a problem on a psychological and philosophical level. Hannah Arendt has a good quote on this:
"Just as terror, even in its pre-total, merely tyrannical form ruins all relationships between men, so the self-compulsion of ideological thinking ruins all relationships with reality. The preparation has succeeded when people have lost contact with their fellow men as well as the reality around them; for together with these contacts, men lose the capacity of both experience and thought. The ideal subject of totalitarian rule is not the convinced Nazi or the convinced Communist, but people for whom the distinction between fact and fiction (i.e., the reality of experience) and the distinction between true and false (i.e., the standards of thought) no longer exist."
Hannah Arendt, from "Crises of the Republic: Lying in Politics, Civil Disobedience, On Violence, and Thoughts on Politics and Revolution"
It's fundamentally damaging to a person's understanding of reality to toy with basic terms like that, because they can no longer finish a thought or speak a sentence properly. It puts them at odds with truth itself. Orwell also spoke about this:
"But if thought corrupts language, language can also corrupt thought. A bad usage can spread by tradition and imitation, even among people who should and do know better."
George Orwell, from "Politics and the English Language" (essay)
Some people might think this isn't much of a hill to die on. But, it's important to understand that language is the key into someone's mind (a mental keystone, if you will). It's how they manipulate us, in addition to the imagery they show us (violence, transgender actors/actresses spending their whole lives impersonating the other sex, the imagery of abuse over and over again on TV and in movies, etc.). It's important not to underestimate it, I think. Particularly this day and age when English standards are flying out the door, the subset of words they use to manipulate us becomes easier to handle because people's vocabularies are smaller.
It definitely could be used to the right end, though. As you said. It just needs to be in the right hands (language, that is).
CHOP, a reference to the French Revolutions and use of guillotines?
They've certainly been violent and destructive already…
I've met some people who are truly vacant, to the point of not being "human" as we think of human beings. I could see those individuals being kicked out of anywhere. They're cold and evil and feel no empathy the way a normal person does. It's not the kind of thing that you can coexist with. It's just a ticking time bomb, and if you've met someone like this, you feel it. Any moment, you just know, they'd do anything to you and not be emotionally burdened by it.
But, I don't think that this is confined to one "heritage" or another. Not the way we typically think of heritage, anyway.
A woman who said she was from Africa put out a video the other day saying pretty much the same thing. It actually looks like USA Today just wrote up the same thing that woman said. At least it's getting traction, though. The more people who hear about it, the better.
There's a method in Eastern philosophy that bypasses language and if MK-Ultra is language-based, it could be the "cure" for it.
It's related to non-dualism and Daoist philosophy. It's a bit complicated and deep to get into on the boards here, but in the Dao De Jing (also Tao Teh King or Tao Te Ching) if you read an accurate translation (i.e. the Mitchell translation is crap), it talks about non-distinction and not distinguishing. Language is a process of distinctions and ceasing distinction in a mental sense essentially reverts the mind to a non-verbal state, resulting in a sort of hard-reset for any language-based programming that might have occurred. I've studied this for more than a decade, so I speak from a point of personal experience. I don't have experience in research about the methods related to MK-Ultra, but if it is language-based, as I said, this could be a viable way to break it.
I should have a link or a copy of it myself. I'll post/upload. Just give me a little time to track it down.
That doesn't mean that language plays no part in it, nor that a language-related method couldn't provide some help. I've done research in medicine and psychology for years. I may not know the torture aspect, but I do understand the healing aspect very, very well.
The angle is high on the first pic. It makes the eye to hairline measure hard to compare. It could be her, or not. Not sure. Possibility, though. Try to get a better angle if you can of the girl in the first shot.
I read about that. I've studied numerous foreign languages over the years (5-10 verbal/written, 20+ written systems) and I personally don't find it plausible. I looked at the man's site and investigated it for myself. I don't consider it a valid lead. His notion of grammar is nonsensical and cryptic, which is enough to fool the average person into believing that there's some sort of brilliant intelligence that must be hiding behind it if it's so difficult to understand. The other reason something is difficult to understand is when it's nonsense. I've had to deal with this distinction when it comes to translating foreign languages. Some translators are so cryptic that their translations seem profound, when they are actually just nonsense. I've seen it first-hand. I could be wrong, but I wouldn't worry about that if I were you. I'm not saying that people aren't using corporations as shell companies to hide actions and money flow, nor am I saying that people aren't screwing with the courts and justice system. They're just not doing it that way, I don't believe.
Any tool is neutral on its own. It becomes positive or negative based upon how it's used.
Think of a steak knife, for instance. It can cut food and help you not to choke on your dinner. Or, it could maim or kill an innocent person.
I think LSD could be thought of in the same way. Open someone's mind and then subject them to positive things and they might heal or expand their thinking. Open someone's mind and subject them to negative things and they will become deeply hurt and traumatized. Simply the act of opening the mind isn't either good or bad. The behaviors which follow and what the mind ingests determines the positivity or negativity of the process.
Is Q talking about Autists = Anons or Autists = autistics. Q often uses double meanings.
If Q is talking about actual autistics, seeing the forest for the trees is a problem for someone with an autistic mindset, and that could be what Q meant.
Just a theory.
SAUCE
Just in case it wasn't caught before. This is the sauce on the African (?) woman talking about the same things the USA Today fact checker brought up:
https://twitter.com/obianuju/status/1270053042340139008
Never tried it personally. Only read about it in the context of medical treatments. A lot of drugs used to be used experimentally for pain treatments and trauma. It's a lot more restricted now. I'm glad it helped you!