https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2020/06/17/report-doj-to-propose-rolling-back-big-techs-legal-immunity/?utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook

*

The Department of Justice is preparing proposals to roll back the legal immunities enjoyed by Big Tech companies under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act (CDA), in measures that will be announced as early as Wednesday, sources told the Wall Street Journal.

Via the WSJ:

The Justice Department is set to propose a rollback of legal protections that online platforms have enjoyed for more than two decades, in an effort to make tech companies more responsible in how they police their content, according to a Trump administration official.

Section 230 gives Big Tech companies immunity from lawsuits arising from user-generated content. If a person is defamed on Google, YouTube, Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, or other big tech platforms like Reddit, those platforms are not legally liable for the content like a traditional publisher might be. This allows social media platforms to host billions of posts from users without a potentially crippling legal risk.

As Big Tech platforms have grown increasingly interested in censoring content posted by their users, however, many lawmakers have argued that they are behaving like traditional publishers, censoring and editing and approving their users’ posts. As such, a growing number of lawmakers have argued that the legal immunities of Section 230 should be contingent on platforms maintaining a hands-off approach to the speech of their users.

Another problematic element of Section 230 is subsection c-2, which grants tech companies immunity from lawsuits arising from their censorship of “objectionable” content. This immunity gives them broad leeway to censor users, leaving no legal recourse for those who are censored — even if their social media accounts are critical to their livelihood or career.

However, according to the Wall Street Journal, the Justice Department’s proposals go beyond merely addressing the question of censorship:

The department’s proposal, for instance, would remove legal protections when platforms facilitate or solicit third-party content or activity that violates federal criminal law, such as online scams and trafficking in illicit drugs. The department also wouldn’t confer immunity to platforms in instances involving online child exploitation and sexual abuse, terrorism or cyberstalking. Those carve-outs are needed to curtail immunity for internet companies to allow victims to seek redress, the official said.

The Justice Department also will seek to make clear that tech platforms don’t have immunity in civil-enforcement actions brought by the federal government, and can’t use immunity as a defense against antitrust claims that they removed content for anticompetitive reasons.

According to the report, it also appears that the Justice Department won’t try to strip tech companies of their immunity for censoring “objectionable” content, instead aim to spur Big Tech to be “fairer and more consistent in their decisions to take down content they find objectionable.”

1 of 2

>>9643949 (lb)

Hehehe. No he didn't. You're watching a motion picture show, remember?

>>9643965 (lb)

It is part of the plan, yes. Remember how some in the White House, minus @POTUS, were wearing a mask for a while, and the Press Pool wasn't, but then they were, but then John Roberts said don't worry and the other idiot said they were all vaccinated anyway, but then there wasn't a vaccine yet, but there was a 18 cent pill that works, but it didn't work, but it did, but we can't know because everyone cancelled their studies, but the studies published were lies, but they weren't, but then a pornographer was murdered by the police, and now some places are being ransacked so everyone forgot about the virus until they mentioned it again?

It was for SHOW. Not TELL. Remember?

>Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 ID: da9947 No.8978612 📁

>Apr 30 2020 17:59:59 (EST)

>Sometimes you can't TELL the public the truth.

>YOU MUST SHOW THEM.

A deeply entrenched enemy who controls the vast majority of communications is only defeated by……….

>Game theory.

>Q

Two things here that anons didn't pick up on, and nobody seemed to question Q about, so I'll just point out the obvious:

1. They are defeated by rounding the fuckers up, publicly announcing the charges of sedition and treason against them, making certain the entire world knows that they are nothing more than a CIA rogue operation, and shipping them off to GITMO. But optics matter (but they don't) so can't do that before the election. But, as Q stated themselves:

>who controls the vast majority of communications

who controls the vast majority of communications

>who controls the vast majority of communications

who controls the vast majority of communications

If, IF the MSM is controlled by the cabal, as Q has pointed out many times, now, then we know for a fact they are running an OPERATION on US SOIL against US CITIZENS which is AGAINST THE FUCKING LAW. If you (not you anon, but the Law Enforcement Executive Branch, you) have evidence of that, then let loose the seals of WRATH (Biblical) on them. Go ahead and show the public the real truth. Lock up the bastards for sedition/treason. Knowingly pushing false information. But anons know why that doesn't happen, right? Catch 22. Soooo what next?

1. The context of "Patriots in control" is specific to the posts it was in. Let's take a look at those 8 posts:

https://qanon.pub/?q=patriots%20in%20

>You were told what battles we face.

>Strategic.

>Pre_planned.

>Patriots in control.

Q told everyone to sit down and shut up here.

>Those who would normally hide in the >shadows are forced into the LIGHT.

>P-A-N-I-C

>Patriots in Control.

Q was calling out Ted Lieu

>Start from beginning.

>(Small) sampling of proofs.

>Patriots in control.

>You are the news now.

Q was telling anons how to explain Q to others. If you haven't reached your max capacity of people made aware of Q, yet, then work on that. If you have, join the club and wait for the movie to end. Be prepared for people to go all "shitlord" on you until something is made public about Q.

>THESE PEOPLE DESERVE TO [ ].

>THESE PEOPLE ARE SICK.

>WE ARE THE CURE.

>PATRIOTS IN CONTROL.

>THE WORLD WILL KNOW THE TRUTH.

Q is alluding to Comey that they are going to get JUSTICE to the face, and the public will know the real truth. MSM won't be reporting that, though. It'll be patriots. Again, expectations set.

>Goodbye, Mr. Rosenstein.

>Goodbye, Mr. Mueller.

>PATRIOTS IN CONTROL

This one should be obvious. Wasn't talking to anons, here.

>Smile for the camera.

>Patriots in control.

Talking to Comey again.

>>9644770

2 of 2

>Define cover.

>Patriots in control.

Q explaining to anons about U1, Iran, and Syria operations. Notice how we're not talking about any of that stuff anymore. The real problem that anons see, that Q knows about, that makes this all a bit of a cryptic secret is this:

The message, and its disbursement, is subtle. Almost too subtle. When folks are wearing masks like @VP, Ivanka, and they are getting passed out at rallies, people don't know WTF to think. Some folks went full on fuck it from day one. Some resisted, then succumbed. Some flew the white flag day one, and won't give up their masks until @POTUS says "Hehe… it was all a gag!". Others are going to straight up harass folks for not wearing them. Also, there will be mandatory COVID-19 testing from every hospital in the country before people can do things like get their cancer removed, or get tonsils taken out, etc.

So, to make this abundantly clear to anons, when Q says "Patriots In Control", remember the context of the post. Very important because that does not mean "complete control over everything". It means that in regards to certain aspects of the Plan that require things to be done in certain ways, patriots are, indeed, in control. As far as pretty much the rest of the world, you can only control that which you have influence over. This excludes:

-MSM

-China

-Iran

-The Cabal

-Some of the Pedo networks that haven't been brought to justice just yet (they are actively working on this, BTW)

-Epstein

-Cops that kill people

-Antifa that assaults people

-Some rogue elements in gov't (yet)

-Some rogue elements in military (yet)

-Ed Snowden

-Julian Assange

-Major Corporations that control our music, TV, movies, and commercials

-WH Press Corps

-And lots of other people/places/things that people attribute to Q by the logic of some magical scifi shit they've been told to believe by the 1000s of disinfo agents on the web

When Q, Q+ and AG Barr is ready to strike, they will. Anons already know it won't happen before a particular date. So, strap in, enjoy the ride, and wait for it.

>>9644817

>Tip of the spear

>Is wearing a mask

This is why we cannot have nice things.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/06/exclusive-mysterious-case-raz-chaz-blm-warlord-owns-multiple-guns-including-uzi-tesla-bmw-jaguar-xj-millions-properties-supported-dubai-government/?utm_source=Twitter&utm_medium=PostTopSharingButtons&utm_campaign=websitesharingbuttons

Solomon Samuel Simone (aka RAZ from CHAZ or CHOP) is the proclaimed warlord of CHAZ, the multi-block area located in Seattle. Raz hates America but owns multiple guns, luxury automobiles, millions in real estate.

Advertisement - story continues below

More importantly, Raz is supported by the Islamic government in Dubai.

The leader of CHAZ, Warlord Raz Simone was previously identified running guns in the newly formed country in the center of Seattle. Today we have more on RAZ thanks to the work of Yaacov Apelbaum.

Raz the warlord, doesn’t only run guns, he owns guns. Raz owns a couple of handguns, which were somehow ‘restored’ through a special intervention after a conviction.

TRENDING: EXCLUSIVE: The Mysterious Case of RAZ from CHAZ - BLM Warlord Owns Multiple Guns (including an Uzi), a Tesla, BMW and Jaguar XJ, Millions in Properties, and Is Supported by Dubai Government

Raz also owns six semi-automatic rifles, including an AR-15 and AK-47 and an Uzi.

He has armor piercing bullets for these guns as well.

Raz somehow received a grant for $82,000 from the city of Seattle to open his own studio in a building he purchased with another loan.

And Raz owns multiple luxury cars, including a Tesla, a BMW and a Jaguar XJ.

He also owns some prime real estate and rental properties.

He owns the RAZ fashion line, the Aurora Smoke Shop, a social club called “The Spot”, the Black Umbrella Corporation. All this came from funding in sweetheart deals.

Raz’s public relations team has done a lot of work to portray Raz as a gangsta’. Oliver Darcy from CNN has helped him in shaping his image.

Finally, and most importantly, Raz is connected to Islamists. He is involved in the manifesto, Washington State – the first black Muslim independent state. He also is being sponsored and has been hosted by the Dubai government. Raz’s anti-white and anti-America rants are supported. He also has been spotted attending the Sheik Zayed mosque.

>>9644837

What I heard is the reason Jewel left Alaska from the get-go was she was abused by her daddy Atz (not sure what sort of abuse). Jewel has some talent, but she definitely looks like she's carrying some emotional weight around.

https://nypost.com/2020/06/17/brute-accused-of-slugging-elderly-bronx-woman-has-been-arrested-over-100-times/?utm_source=NYPTwitter&utm_campaign=SocialFlow&utm_medium=SocialFlow

MORE ON:

ARRESTS

California man allegedly livestreamed looting on Facebook

NYPD busts suspect in two rape attempts in NYC

New details in stabbing allegedly involving Kareem Abdul-Jabbar's son

Kareem Abdul-Jabbar's son arrested for stabbing neighbor 'multiple times'

A career criminal with more than 100 arrests to his name was busted for cruelly shoving a 92-year-old woman into a Manhattan fire hydrant — leaving his victim too scared to walk alone in her own neighborhood.

The injured elder, a Bronx native named Geraldine, spoke to The Post on Tuesday after cops arrested convicted sex offender Rashid Brimmage, 31, and charged him with attacking her.

“I thought a brick hit me or something hit me on the left side of my head, and I went right down and hit my head against the hydrant,” Geraldine, who asked that her last name be withheld for safety reasons, said of the attack. “Blood was coming out, not spurting blood, but blood was dripping.”

Geraldine, who has lived in Manhattan for more than 50 years, was on her way to Duane Reade when Brimmage allegedly shoved her to the ground near Third Avenue and East 16th Street in Gramercy Park at about 3:30 p.m. Friday.

She slammed against the fire hydrant and lay on the ground until a passerby called 911 and medics rushed her to nearby Beth Israel Hospital.

The former teacher, who never married but is dating an 89-year-old lawyer, said her physical wounds were relatively minor and have since healed — but the mental toll has been much more severe.

SEE ALSO

Elderly victim shoved by brute 'fearful to walk the streets alone'

“Mostly I’m shaken. My head still hurts where it was bleeding, where I hit the hydrant — or where he hit me, I don’t know,” she said.

“Mainly it’s psychological — just the fear of going out on the street,” she added.

“This damned guy put me in a state where I’m fearful to walk the streets alone. So my super’s trying to find somebody who will walk me to a park nearby or to the supermarket, that kind of thing. So that’s the problem.”

Brimmage was busted by cops Tuesday and charged with assault after investigators recognized him from video footage of the attack, authorities said.

The frequent offender has now been arrested 103 times since 2005 for petty crimes and sex offenses, sources said.

The creep was convicted of sexual misconduct in 2012, then arrested for two sex offenses in 2014, police sources said.

Detectives walk Rashid Brimmage, 31, of The Bronx, out of the 13th Precinct in Midtown.Taidgh Barron

In May of that year, he was busted for exposing and fondling himself on an East Harlem street, the sources said.

Just months later, in July, he was arrested for grabbing a woman’s behind at a Third Avenue deli.

In 2017, he failed to notify authorities that he changed his address and had to register as a sex offender, state records show.

At the time of Friday’s attack, Brimmage had three open criminal cases in the city, according to court records.

New York Post front page

He was arrested Feb. 17 for a misdemeanor assault and harassment charge for an incident that happened in The Bronx a week earlier, according to records. He was released without bail in the case.

He was busted in the borough again March 5 and slapped with a trespassing summons, according to court records.

And most recently, he was arrested March 9 in Manhattan and hit with criminal possession of a controlled substance, assault and attempted assault charges.

He was given a desk appearance ticket for the bust and ordered to return to court at the end of July.

Additional reporting by Rebecca Rosenberg

>>9645193

Anon,

That's Q and co. taunting the enemy. The DS already knows the NSA is working with @POTUS. Anons knew that right off the bat, too. So we get to see the DS pull shit like COVID-19, and publicly, our leadership has to play along (actually, they don't, but that's a whole other discussion), while Q backchannels the truth; like it needs to be hidden from plain view for some odd reason.

The biggest problem most anons have is not understanding context. In Q's drops, there's a few different conversations happening; not just Anons and Q. Q is talking to a wide range of folks, all the time, in their drops. Sometimes, Q does this within a single drop. Each drop, anons should ask:

1. Is this for anons, or someone else?

2. Can this drop be decoded yet, or are we going to have to wait for news to break?

3. Is @POTUS shit-posting on twitter within a certain timeframe?

4. If 3 = true, then analyze for grammar.

5. If the Q post was a twitter (You), follow the link to see how long it takes for inevitable ET and Praying Medic-Mantis to say "You dun got Q'd!"

Until 11.3, which Q and @POTUS both have stated is what this is all about, I wouldn't expect Barr to move on much of anything. This is called "setting expectations". Look at Q's posts as of recent. Of the last 18 posts, the subject matter of 15 of them has been directly about the election, or how the D's really think of blacks. 2 of them were esoteric and out of left field, and one was a music track.

We're going to eventually find out what's in those sealed indictments. We'll find out what the first arrest is, if it hasn't already happened and we missed it (because arrests are happening every day). But until then, just hurry up and wait.