Anonymous ID: 787daf June 17, 2020, 10:26 a.m. No.9645592   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Lawmakers Target Google Over Demonetization Efforts Against Conservative Website

 

Lawmakers are looking for answers after Google attempted to demonetize The Federalist, a conservative website that publishes news stories and opinion pieces. The actions against the website “raise serious concerns that Google is abusing its monopoly power in an effort to censor political speech with which it disagrees,” Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) said in a letter on Tuesday, referencing how Google in the past has made a number of moves against conservatives. The push to ban The Federalist from Google ads came from a collaboration between a group called the Center for Countering Digital Hate and a unit inside NBC News that focuses on open source research. NBC sent Google a report the center created that aims to hurt certain websites. According to the organization, these sites were profiting from articles making unsubstantiated claims about Black Lives Matter protests and riots. In response, Google told NBC that The Federalist and ZeroHedge, another news website, were demonetized, or blocked from making money from Google Ads, a service that places advertisements on websites. NBC’s article falsely described the news websites as far-right.

 

Shortly after the article was published late Tuesday, Google said in a statement that “The Federalist was never demonetized.” The issue wasn’t any of the articles The Federalist published, according to Google, but issues related to comments made on the articles. “As the comment section has now been removed, we consider this matter resolved and no action will be taken,” Google stated. The Federalist confirmed it removed its comment section so it could keep Google Ads. Cruz said in his letter that Google “seems more than happy” to play a censorship role “by trying to break the financial back of a media publication with which it disagrees.” Google’s decision to target The Federalist “is transparently politically motivated,” Cruz asserted, noting that a number of websites known as left-leaning allow comments. “I don’t know what the objectionable comments were that individual users might have posted on The Federalist, but any objective review would no doubt demonstrate at least as many profane, racist, or indefensible user comments on these other sites that would equally violate Google’s alleged standards,” he wrote. YouTube, which is a subsidiary of Google, also includes thousands of profane, racist, and indefensible comments, he added.

 

Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) said on Twitter in a message to Google that it appears the tech giant is being inconsistent. Google wants to treat The Federalist’s comment section as the outlet’s speech but simultaneously say the content the tech company hosts is not its speech under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, the lawmaker alleged. Section 230 bestows special protections on some companies, including social media companies, shielding them from liability. During an appearance on “News News @ Night,” Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) said what happened today “may be a turning point.” “What Google did to The Federalist, I think this is a turning point today,” he said.

 

https://www.theepochtimes.com/lawmakers-target-google-over-demonetization-efforts-against-conservative-website_3391604.html

Anonymous ID: 787daf June 17, 2020, 10:35 a.m. No.9645745   🗄️.is 🔗kun

DOJ Plans To Roll Back Tech Monopoly Legal Protections Over Left-Wing Speech Policing

 

The Justice Department announced plans Wednesday to make legislative recommendations for changes to the legal protections surrounding big tech companies. The decision comes just a day after Google Ads attempted to demonetize The Federalist over “race based content” and just a month after President Trump signed an executive order with intentions to curb the cut back on the protections after alleged censorship of conservative news outlets. Attorney General William Barr, according to the Wall Street Journal, also “has repeatedly voiced concerns about online-platform immunity.” According to the WSJ, the proposal “would remove legal protections when platforms facilitate or solicit third-party content or activity that violates federal criminal law, such as online scams and trafficking in illicit or counterfeit drugs” and rescind monetary damage immunity from companies that knowingly allow illicit activity to continue. It would also ensure that companies “don’t have immunity in civil-enforcement actions brought by the federal government, and can’t use immunity as a defense against antitrust claims that they removed content for anticompetitive reasons.”

 

Despite claims by many tech companies that Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, the section that grants them protection, is necessary, the proposal’s goal “would be to require platforms to adhere to their terms of service as well as their public claims about their practices. Platforms also would have to provide reasonable explanations of their decisions.” Lawmakers in Congress are already examining ways to crack down on big tech censorship. On Wednesday, Sen. Joshua Hawley (R-M0.) along with Sens. Marco Rubio, Mike Braun, and Tom Cotton debuted new legislation that would allow “users who believe the provider is not ‘operating in good faith’ by consistently and fairly applying its content rules could sue for $5,000 and attorneys’ fees.”

 

https://thefederalist.com/2020/06/17/doj-plans-to-roll-back-tech-monopoly-legal-protections-over-left-wing-speech-policing/

https://twitter.com/HawleyMO/status/1273225246334738432