>>9646522

>It makes little sense to enable large online platforms (particularly dominant ones) to invoke Section 230 immunity in antitrust cases, where liability is based on harm to competition, not on third-party speech.

This is why Google backtracked on the Federalist. They were walking into an antitrust trap.

Posted last night.

Add a few years and 20 lbs?

https://www.atlantamagazine.com/news-culture-articles/cecily-mcmillan-memoir-inspire-millennials/

>>9646720

Or this one, a Bernie DSA activist from Atlanta.

>>9646818

Proud Boys are likely paid out of the same pockets as Antifa.

Every Yin needs a Yang.