"For most Majorca (Mallorca)ns, history didn't really begin until the Catalans retook the island from the Moors in the 13th century. On the other hand, experts date the first islanders to between 1300 and 1000BC. "
this quote is from :
https://www.majorca.com/v/history/
why does a place that was occupied in the Mediteranian really only know it's History from the time of Christian liberating it from the Morrish thug-cult?
gee could it be that the Moors were all about erasing History?
https://wallstreetonparade.com/2020/06/the-feds-paycheck-protection-program-gave-a-tiny-nj-bank-5-3-billion-9-percent-of-all-the-money-its-spent-thus-far/
how much longer can the . . . . . keep getting away with it?
it might not be well known that throughout the 'conquored' regions they allowed 'religious liberty'. Ask yourself who was reall running things. who were the owners. who were the grunts.
and if you read all the history of it, even though the thug-cult errased history , for example in Mallorca, now here is a proof: they say that they did not have real history from before the Moor-thugs were outted. And yet the part that talks about the Moorthugs taking over . . . says that the Moorthugs 'brought it an new period of prosperity'.
so here is the proof: the writer of the fluff contridicts himself. They don't say 'and the island was converted into a brothel for the enjoyment of . . . who worked the men as slaves and treated the women as cattle, and maintained a moorthug army.'
they say that the Moors brought in prosperity.
but then if so why did they need to be expelled?
and most of History has been recently tainted with the 'magic age' of the moorthug invaders.
I say it's bullshit: the truth needs to be found. And they need to be called what they were: brutal sex-cult invaders.
so the police officer was facing multi . . .
no wait the district attorney was.
ya, Gammar kitty.
this is a case where a simple rewrite, adding a couple of semicolons, makes the reading much easier.
but the point: typical squinted eyed hypicrictal behavior by someone with the look of a moorish thug.
Tales of Brave Ulyssys
who knew that just a hop to the beach from Rome was a well known place . . . with a really interesting ancient story.
here is the place:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mount_Circeo
And . . . the story of a gawdess.
and an ancient hero.
the various islands south of Sicily on the way to Tunis.
Lampedusa
Malta
Linosa
Pantellaria
Sharqui Island
onward.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tusculum
The Bees built a mansion ontop of the old temple. Looks like a cool place to visit.
a cabal psyop?
cures should not be patent-able.
they should be made to be free to use and a reward should be granted for finding it.
the more cures the more grants.
if they make one cure they get one grant.
they don't keep getting rich and prevent new research and profiteer over other people's anquish over what very well may be a false diagnosis.
he probably spent less than 20 minutes on the lyrics and wrote it mostly by making it up as he sang it into a tape recorder.
whatever, it's a song.
it's not scripture.
don't some say that he just wrote it as a genre song and didn't really believe any of it anyway?
I mean, have you seen Polithem Pam?
he was a mystic?
no, a lyricist!
they don't care about any narrative other than the one that htey are told to parrot.
anything alternative, or conjectorial is called 'conspiracy'.
a single person makes a thought. He has far out ideas. He says 'I can't really know'.
all the rest say "that's true"
a conspiracy to think for ourselves.
those who go on about 'conspiracy theory' when they are talking about the speculative and contemplative ideas of an individual person, where there can be no conspiracy as there is only one person saying these things, the person who says that is 'conspiracy theory' often does this in a chorus of others who chant along.
so we see where the conspiracy is: with those who call alternative conjecture of an individual , where there can be no conspiracy, as if it were that, when it can not be because there is only one person.
and yet the chorus, (a conspiracy) will squak along, like parrots that free range in the forum of ideas and squawk on cue.
the whole idea of 'conspiracy theory' is thus shown to be Orwelllian.
it's bunk.
one person makes up a narrative that you don't like, and you imagine legions of people agreeing, and not only agreeing but colluding together and it's made you so fearful that you imagine them all as worst case partisans who violate the decorum in the forum of ideas so severely that you would cast them all into a gulag and banish them from the historical record.
when you visit Sicily you might notice that the apses for statues are often high up above the plazas. They are way out of reach of anyone wondering through.
Gee, I wonder why.
filtering is not speech.
but it is allowed.
if you don't know what it is, how can you know to 'filter' it to 'not let it enter?'
anyway, ya, if you notice poison graphics, like the wishcraft of idiots holding animal carcusas as if that's artistic, I say ad block that.
then when they show it over (the always do) you won't see it.
but speech is speech
and filter is a filter.
I think they are not the same.
fake
informing people on how to adblock poison images does not prevent the anon from seeing those posts. The images do not show up. Plus the anon has to do this work.
you're statement is just the same as the one who is selling advertising and says 'don't let them fast forward through it'
images that are posioned to cast spells should be adblocked.
that is not censor ship, it's just common sense.
would you leave a jar of bees on your table with the lid off it?
'incitng to filter' listen to your cabal-yammering.
you are just red texting semantic issues.
if you filter and then say 'filter' that is speech.
if they have a way of knowing you filter, that is speech.
but the mere act of filtering is not speech.
when you adjust the volume control on your headset, that is 'speech'?
it is if you do it to let other's hear it, but most people do it for their own preferences.
red text, annoying, yes. free speech? why not.
spurge his catch phrase
'Looo Eye Cue Shell'
you're very transparent.
Jack is so talented. I wish he would translate this meme for us.
spurge of the catch-phrase anon
does it bother you that now your namefag name is 'Loo eye cue catch-phrase shill?'