Justice Department Issues Recommendations for Section 230 Reform

(link: https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-issues-recommendations-section-230-reform )

The Department of Justice released today a set of reform proposals to update the outdated immunity for online platforms under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996. Responding to bipartisan concerns about the scope of 230 immunity, the department identified a set of concrete reform proposals to provide stronger incentives for online platforms to address illicit material on their services while continuing to foster innovation and free speech. The department’s findings are available here. (link: https://www.justice.gov/ag/department-justice-s-review-section-230-communications-decency-act-1996?utm_medium=email&utm_source=govdelivery )

>>9658215

Readout from Attorney General William P. Barr’s Meeting with the Presidential Commission on Law Enforcement and the Administration of Justice

(link: https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/readout-attorney-general-william-p-barr-s-meeting-presidential-commission-law-enforcement-and )

Work on certification would explore ways to incorporate a standardized certification process across law enforcement, acknowledging that the certification requirements will have to be flexible, given disparities in size and resources between urban, rural, and tribal agencies. Developing a database would allow agencies to report use of excessive force into a uniform system accessible by all law enforcement agencies. Rethinking the law enforcement response to social problems would delve into the intersection of homelessness, mental health, and substance abuse and identify ways to fund social service providers who could reduce the burden of social service calls on law enforcement.

>>9658230

Text of a Letter from the President to the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the President of the Senate

(link: https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/text-letter-president-speaker-house-representatives-president-senate-82/ )

Dear Madam Speaker: (Dear Mr. President:)

Consistent with the provisions of 19 U.S.C. 1330(c)(1), this is to notify the Congress that I have designated Jason Kearns as Chairman and Randolph J. Stayin as Vice Chairman of the United States International Trade Commission, effective June 17, 2020.

Sincerely,

DONALD J. TRUMP

>>9658185

No Tsunami Warning, Advisory, Watch, or Threat

(link: https://www.tsunami.gov/ )

>>9658291

Procedural requirements not met.

>>9658302

Chief Justice John Roberts wrote for the court that the administration did not pursue the end of the program properly.

"We do not decide whether DACA or its rescission are sound policies," Roberts wrote. "We address only whether the agency complied with the procedural requirement that it provide a reasoned explanation for its action. Here the agency failed to consider the conspicuous issues of whether to retain forbearance and what if anything to do about the hardship to DACA recipients."

The Department of Homeland Security can try again, he wrote.

The court's four conservative justices dissented. Justice Clarence Thomas, in a dissent joined by Justices Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch, wrote that DACA was illegal from the moment it was created under the Obama administration in 2012.

Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote in a separate dissent that he was satisfied that the administration acted appropriately in trying to end the program.

>>9658356

>>9658356

>Here the agency failed to consider the conspicuous issues of whether to retain forbearance and what if anything to do about the hardship to DACA recipients…

Obviously, they didn't argue strongly, again. Trump counselors need better arguments, or nothing will get done thru SCOTUS.

>>9658401

No they didn't.

Chief Justice John Roberts wrote for the court that the administration did not pursue the end of the program properly.

"We do not decide whether DACA or its rescission are sound policies," Roberts wrote. "We address only whether the agency complied with the procedural requirement that it provide a reasoned explanation for its action. Here the agency failed to consider the conspicuous issues of whether to retain forbearance and what if anything to do about the hardship to DACA recipients."

The Department of Homeland Security can try again, he wrote.

Idiots reacting to SCOTUS decisions this week are emotional, not logical. Try thinking, instead of raging. You are acting just like the libtards, screaming at the sky when something doesn't read like you want it to.

>>9658415

Have a copy…

>>9658432

IF:

The court's four conservative justices dissented. Justice Clarence Thomas, in a dissent joined by Justices Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch, wrote that DACA was illegal from the moment it was created under the Obama administration in 2012.

Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote in a separate dissent that he was satisfied that the administration acted appropriately in trying to end the program.

THEN:

>Trump counselors need better arguments, or nothing will get done thru SCOTUS.