>>9668066

>@parscales on why Parler

If all patriots would leave twatter and go to parler,

the Left would have won.

Twatter censors patriots and other dissenters.

It makes no difference if the Left censors or if people with other opinions just vanish from twatter.

The Left's goal is to create the illusion that all people, or the majority of all people think the way, leftists do.

Parscale, Bongino, Scavino promoting Parler tells me that they want people to leave twatter.

But it also tells me that the Trump administration isn't able to reign in Big Tech.

Calling for patriots to just leave the public space for being censored means that censorship won.

Will twatter shrivel to a nonimportant space for just the hardcore left then?

I doubt it.

The "unpolitical" majority of the people will just stay on twatter and think that it is "normal" and therefore acceptable that all the opinions of the left are "how evreybody thinks".

A big win for the Left and another big loss for the Right.

You don't leave Central Park, NYC, in the 80's because the thugs took over.

You send in the law enforcement to take the place back for ALL citizens.

>>9668324

Thx, for you reply and I agree with you

(while I also still agree with what I was saying).

>If trump left twitter and his following went to Parler twitter wouldnt last it would go the way of MySpace

This is what people like you and me believe.

Maybe it would work that way in the US.

But the fight against Big Tech/ MSM cannot be won by "letting them be".

Voting means nothing, if politics cannot be influenced or changed by voting in another party or president.

Voting for Trump was a vote against the DS; MSM, Big Pharma, Big Tech.

If this administration doesn't have a sharper sword than suggesting to leave twatter and migrate to parler…that is defeat.

"Drain the swamp" cannot mean to tell your voters "let the swamp be, just move somewhere else"…

"The world is watching".

This is true.

The world will watch Trump and his fight with Twitter.

What do you think will the people ww think, when Potus cannot legally force twitter to not censor conservatives?

>>9668373

>Easiest solution was for us to just cumulatively desert ALL media technology

Yes, this would be a solution.

But I doubt that people will ever give up internet participation and cell phones.

All politics ensure more and more that your everyday life can only go on smoothly, if you participate

People are now (nearly) fully dependent on Big Tech working together with bureaucracy to ensure that you HAVE to use it.

Some see this as an entrapment, I do.

Most people do not care.

>>9668394

I respect your opinion.

But if this is your opinion and your heartfelt believe,

I cannot understand, why you are hanging out on 8kun.

>>9668720

>Central park is owned by all citizens.

>Twatter is a private company.

>Big difference

All citizens paid the money that made it possible for twitter to exist.

The internet was built through tax money.

Trough money used by Pentagon and intel agencies.

When it suits twitter, they claim to be a public marketplace for opinions.

When it suits them they claim to be private and not to be a public marketplace.

It is either this or that, cannot be both.

And it has to be fought out in court(s).

Potus wasn't voted in to usher conservative people to places on the internet, where they will be hidden away like in some broom closet.

Conservatives voted for Trump to bring back freedom of speech for all and not to run away from this most important fight.