>>9671301 lb

What an ultimate of strawmen!

The Doctrine of Christ was fully given and received in the time of the Apostles, as Jude reminded. He also warned about infiltrators sneaking in "unawares", meaning unbeknownst to the congregation.

ANY religious organization calling itself Christian claiming to have "developed" the "theology" blinds ANYONE released to be deceived by it, no matter in WHICH nation it is located.

Of course, he's lumping in all Christian congregations which happen to have a primarily white membership, and he's also disregarding centuries of history where the early Christians traveled primarily first through the Roman Empire. The Roman Empire was based in EUROPE, made up of what would be characterized as "whites", including northern Africa and the Middle East. After the horrors of a Europe under the control of the Papacy, Europeans, at that time primarily white, sought to gain freedom from that past oppression. It is these primarily white colonists that sought that freedom in the new world.

With them, they brought their new formed congregations free of the Papacy and its influence in Britain's state church. These congregations were a contrast to the oppressive Popish influence also invading the new world. If not for this, slaves arriving from the old world would not have had access to Christianity free of the Papacy.

>>9671960

You are implying God put something inside of her to produce His flesh. That isn't what happened. While His Spirit enveloped Mary in Him, He formed His flesh only from her egg. There was utterly no sexual act whatsoever, not even sperm.

Besides that, women in their fertility were given in MARRIAGE, and not for illicit relationships.

>>9671974

Christ was not formed as a result of a sexual act.

>>9672163

>You can't prove any of it ever occurred.

That's why it's called "faith". It cannot be known except by the Gift of God's Faith in His Son's Testimony, the Spirit of all prophecy.

Josephus mentioned Jesus. The Dead Sea scrolls were primarily written prior to Christ's advent. However, the Prophets had indeed foretold of Him.

>>9672160

All of that is pagan pageantry and has nothing to do with Christ Jesus.

>>9672442

The term "seed" in no way refers to physical sperm, but to His Son, who is God the Word.

Next, Miriam was of marriageable age because she had reached fertile maturity. Since she was promised in marriage to Joseph, she had to become pregnant with Christ before they came together. Christ could not be mistaken as a seed of any earthly father.

There was nothing curious about that.

And it was not unusual for an older man to marry a young woman since a man first had to come into an inheritance so he could provide for a family.

>>9672334

Correction: Apostasy hijacked Christianity for monetary and power gain, as well as to disguise its paganism as "christianity". The difference is revealed when such "christianity" teaches things never taught by Moses, the Prophets, Christ, or the Apostles.

>>9672539

Those of the fallen nature can never get it. Fallen nature has a mind at enmity against God, and it will not submit to it. Mere human logic cannot understand this because there is more knowledge than is available to Man. Fallen Man makes assertions based on knowledge not included in what he has available then calls this "truth".

>>9672576

Josephus was not a believer. Obviously, as an unbelieving Jew, he would not speak in a good light.

>>9672556

That is a scenario not determined by God as He had determined Christ come when ancient Israel and its temple still existed, a time in which they did not have our mode of ethics.

Regardless, 14 year-olds give birth to children often these days.

As far as "acceptability", it depends upon the culture, no? In the U.S. the laws define what is acceptable, ostensibly according to the people's desire. God doesn't call Christians to be transgressors of laws that do not contradict His own laws.