From a rational standpoint, being as it's impossible to tell just how bad it will get, we really should expect the worst and plan accordingly.
A lot of actions don't square with many of the so-called rules of this realm.
Games are being played in such long duration that they span many lifetimes, much longer than any person is thought to live.
Something just isn't adding up.
>Everything is monitored at every level.
I'm completely convinced this is more fear porn than reality. There are so many of us it would take a staff of a million people just to monitor mothers aged 20-22, white, college dropouts with brown hair living in the western half of the US.
Give him some money, a home and put him in school with our children, immediately!
That's nice they didn't make him pay for his own retirement party
>Who the fuck else sees a problem here?
I do as does my 10TB of backup data
Plenty of us have learned over time to back up everything.
>Would running Ghidra on this tracking shit tell us something?
If you know how to read and comprehend assembly, it would tell you everything. The problem is the first part of what I wrote.
it seems to be (evil sadistic) manifested from clinging to power.
Suppression of information to not allow for a proper contender to the throne, so to speak.
At some point in the past, a great cataclysm occurred and all the built up wealth of knowledge was hoarded by a small group while the rest of humanity went back to baseline.
I'm just stuck as to the code of silence.
The politicians now are taking bait that Trump is laying out for them (money bombs) knowing they will be exposed by doing so. This tells me there is someone they fear more than US Mil / POTUS.
There is some "thing" we aren't aware of that effects everyone on earth in such a way those at the top are terrified of "it".
Founded in 1952 by Macmillan in London, St. Martin's Press…
> A childhood friend of mine worked there
I know the majority of the place is uninhabitable but it is a continent. I'm sure someone could work there and not be privy to what's going on in another area of the continent.
Millions and millions of people will defend this person while at the same time categorize us as crazy.
That's where we're at.
shiny lures in clearer water
darker lures in murky water
deeper on sunny days
surface poppers on rainy days
there you go.
the 800,000 number is terrifying but something like 95% of the children are found with the other parent or a relative withing 24 hours.
still is insane to think 10's or up to 100+ children get abducted every day in the US.
so you're saying the barrier to entry for a job in antarctica is set on the low side?
No I don't want them harmed.
I shouldn't have said I did. They're lost and searching. Misguided, but not evil.
I hope they come around sooner than later.
>ty
yw
can't help you on deep sea fishing, but I spent every day of my youth fishing fresh water access points. Lakes, ponds, streams, rivers, dams, inlets, everything. It was a good excuse to get out of the home.
I'm not one to adjust my behavior down to meet the behavior of others.
>you ended it.
I don't have any issue with enacting fair justice or balancing the scales, I just don't like being the one to put forth the imbalance.
These are kids. The controllers that enacted the imbalance should pay.
>AND the trigger man
I disagree here but wouldn't challenge your stance on the matter.
I don't think a hired gun/killer should bear responsibility for the act. I don't tie any value to the act unless it's cruel for unnecessary purpose. I suppose I would personally not see justice in punishing a person for offering a swift death on contract of another, I only blame the contractor.
Again, I wouldn't challenge your stance on it, either. I can see your point of view.
I just consider the trigger man a tool and to be seen as no more than a utilitarian aspect of the act.
See above. These kids are seeking acceptance and found it with the wrong group led by nefarious actors. I don't put much responsibility upon them unless they have priors for the same offense or otherwise should know better. Degrees of responsibility, I suppose.
>Am I making any sense here?
Yes you are.
I suppose I would say that were there a new group forming a civilization and I was pitching my voice, I would expect others (the majority) to see things more in line with the common view and wouldn't argue my point. Possibly not even speak it depending on the situation and group.
Chicken egg argument, essentially.
but who was mothra?