Anonymous ID: f6c4a2 June 20, 2020, 3:23 a.m. No.9680447   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0687 >>0738 >>0778 >>0862 >>0866 >>1015 >>1121 >>1172

US attorney in New York disputes Barr claim that he's resigning

update @ 6am 6-20-20

 

The U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York pushed back Friday night against reports that he was resigning from the position.

 

Geoffrey Berman, who oversaw prosecutions of allies of President Donald Trump as well as a probe of Trump’s personal lawyer Rudy Giuliani said he learned he was stepping down when he read a press release about it, The Associated Press reported.

 

Reacting to the news of his departure, Berman said he would not be leaving right away.

 

DOJ TRIES TO BLOCK BOLTON BOOK BY SEEKING INJUNCTION, TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER

 

“I will step down when a presidentially appointed nominee is confirmed by the Senate. Until then, our investigations will move forward without delay or interruption,” Berman said in a statement.

 

The earlier report that Berman was resigning came in a statement from Attorney General William Barr, the AP reported.

 

The attorney general said President Trump intends to nominate Jay Clayton, chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission, to replace Berman, with the U.S. attorney in New Jersey, Craig Carpenito, serving on an acting basis beginning July 3.

 

Berman has been in the position for more than two years. Barr's announcement late Friday, came after he visited New York City and met with local police officials there.

 

Preet Bharara, who served in the New York position prior to Berman, disputed Barr's claim that Berman had resigned.

 

“Doesn’t sound like ‘stepping down,'” Bharara wrote on Twitter. “Why does a president get rid of his own hand-picked US Attorney in SDNY on a Friday night, less than 5 months before the election?”

 

Katherine Flaunders, a reporter with ABC News, wrote on Twitter that Barr had offered Berman other jobs, including head of the Civil Division at the Justice Department, but Berman declined the offers.

 

The report of Berman's ouster was likely to raise additional questions from congressional Democrats who have accused Barr of politicizing the Justice Department and acting more like Trump's personal attorney rather than the nation's chief law enforcement officer.

 

The news comes just days after former national security adviser John Bolton claimed in his tell-all book that Trump promised Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan he’d interfere in Halkbank case that was being prosecuted in the Southern District.

 

The office has prosecuted a number of Trump associates, including Trump's former personal lawyer and fixer Michael Cohen, who served a prison sentence for lying to Congress and campaign finance crimes, and has also been investigating Giuliani and his associates.

 

Federal prosecutors in New York are investigating Giuliani’s business dealings, including whether he failed to register as a foreign agent, according to people familiar with the probe. The people were not authorized to discuss the investigation publicly and spoke on the condition of anonymity.

 

Berman, a Republican who contributed to the president’s election campaign, worked for the same law firm as Giuliani and was put in his job by the Trump administration. But as U.S. attorney, he won over some skeptics after he went after Trump allies.

 

He had recused himself from directly overseeing the Cohen investigation for reasons that were never disclosed.

 

Berman was appointed by then-Attorney General Jeff Sessions in January 2018, months after Bharara was fired after refusing to resign along with dozens of other federal prosecutors appointed by President Barack Obama.

 

Three months later, FBI agents raided Cohen's offices, an act the president decried as a politically motivated witch hunt.

 

Berman has taken a direct hand in other investigations that have angered Trump.

 

His office subpoenaed Trump’s inaugural committee for a wide range of documents as part of an investigation into various potential crimes, including possible illegal contributions from foreigners to inaugural events.

 

And weeks before the 2018 midterm election, Berman announced insider trading charges against an ardent Trump supporter, Republican Rep. Chris Collins.

 

Collins, who represented western New York, has since resigned.

(continued w/link)

 

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/us-attorney-in-new-york-disputes-barr-claim-that-hes-resigning

 

anon take:

Based upon Berman comment, the Dems feel a though this is their district (or should at least be an appointment they agree with) and expect and will vie for influence in the appointment above and beyond what DOJ and Barr have legal power (and precedent) to do.

 

This will be a hot topic as we see already, prolly the most powerful USAttorney Districts to control, at least for Dems who at times have weaponized it and influenced it for narrative and politics.

Anonymous ID: f6c4a2 June 20, 2020, 3:36 a.m. No.9680479   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>9680446

guess is

1-to condition people for when [They] launch further attacks so LEO are not called when things are real. (cry wolf Op)

2-have been many reports of this around the country

3-could be to tune in frequencies and test systems to counter the gunfire monitoring systems already in place to neutralize that tech as well as tech which works with the gunfire detectors to aide LE. (CLAS) tech like auto recording meta and ssid's of devices in proximity of gunfire, NRO, Traffic/atm/etc.cam auto data pulls-meta storage.

4-could be to 'MAP' with receiver tech, think of sonar/radar. emit/transmit a frequency and then receive/record to map everything from structures, people, composite densities of area. low frequencies allow this mapping when used with multiple recievers by comparing. analyzing transmission (modulation) with reciever (demod) the entire area can be mapped like a blueprint, density and materials also, with right tech systems everything from hidden and underground shelters, weapons stashes, etc. can be located.

Anonymous ID: f6c4a2 June 20, 2020, 3:51 a.m. No.9680539   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0572 >>0592 >>0986

>>9680492

1- i think we are doing what we should be.

they count on confrontation and it play into their hands,

2- their plans count on opposition and chaos, they have a narrative waiting. a counter demonstration based on their moves is playing into their game.

3- the Op is about showing peaceful strength in numbers and support, Phase 1 is rally.

4- [they] have convinced the minority sjw's they have no opposition, or that opposition is violent and a threat to them. they get moar aggressive and united with direct confrontation that achieves nothing moar than who can yell and punch better.

5- peaceful strength shows we are above them, that we are focused on our version of America (constitutional version) it weakens their resolve to watch, to further protest and see no counter to them.

6- like a kid having a tantrum, sometimes ignoring is BEST, changes their behavior, attention is what they want and have been conditioned for, the protestors/msm/dems all want attention, WHY GIVE it to THEM, on their terms?

Anonymous ID: f6c4a2 June 20, 2020, 4:01 a.m. No.9680572   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0592 >>1100

>>9680539

on this note:

notice how potus gives no legitimacy via a direct appeal or recognition to blm, dems groups.

for a tactical reason, once you recognize a group it gives them power they did not have before, that is the whole Cabal game of group theory in a nutshell.

 

Potus addresses Americans and his supporters, and his enemies in highlighting the failures of what they are doing, how protestors are not helping things, and msm is not helping things, and how dems are aiding and abetting while america is burning, confrontation and direct recognition by Potus of the agitators re. sympathy or recognition fuels the flames it does not extunguish them as the narrative is designed to make people think.

 

they got protests

turned into crimes

moar crimes and burning/looting

moar support by dems/msm

You have to Show Them

who can be happy about what is going on?

the majority is not, dems and msm are by not condemning.

there are many that say Potus needs to intervene forcefully (Tucker, etal.) but think how that plays out, think it through with a historical knowledge of subvervise insurgency and understand what works and doesnt.

Anonymous ID: f6c4a2 June 20, 2020, 4:30 a.m. No.9680654   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0685

>>9680632

good luck anon.

potus is setting up outside stage to speak to outside attendees.

i would enjoy the event, network, share and have FUN!

if so inclined i would get vid of any probs in hope of accountability.

if there are groups there proMaga disseminating material, etc., again if inclined i would gain some data/information.

i am thinking it may be good to plan to gather in smaller local groups in the future to peacefully assemble (not to counter protestors) to allow our local politicians, and potentially companies that we are the majority, we are peaceful, love america and have a voice and presence that commands respect and attention to our needs and wishes, and do not like to be suppressed and discriminated against.

Anonymous ID: f6c4a2 June 20, 2020, 4:40 a.m. No.9680687   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0738 >>0862 >>0866 >>1015 >>1121 >>1172

>>9680447

wonder whats going on, Berman resigns, Barr announces replacement, and Bermans handlers say he cannot resign?'

 

https://justthenews.com/government/courts-law/chief-federal-prosecutor-nyc-resigns-trump-name-sec-replacement

 

added Barr sauce- he announced US Attorney to replace Berman.

 

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/attorney-general-william-p-barr-nomination-jay-clayton-serve-us-attorney-southern-district

Anonymous ID: f6c4a2 June 20, 2020, 5:26 a.m. No.9680866   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1015 >>1121 >>1172 >>1190

>>9680687

>>9680447

AP- Associated Press fuggery re. Berman resignation.

1-June 19th, 9:48pm AP tweet announces Berman resigning.

the original 9:48pm tweet announcing resignation has link to article which may have been switched, it now links to article posted Today, entitled:

DOJ tries to oust US attorney investigating Trump allies

2- June 19th, 11:59pm AP tweet announces Berman not resigning.

 

It appears they announced the resignation on twitter with a link to an article which was subsequently changed to an article produced today, can anyone wayback and find the original?

It does not seem to be on their site, makes no sense that they announce the resignation and the article it now links to counters their intial tweet, smears the DOJ and was posted today?

 

faking news in realt time

https://twitter.com/AP/status/1274190150470336513

Anonymous ID: f6c4a2 June 20, 2020, 6:08 a.m. No.9681069   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1078

>>9680716

It is for you to figure out for yourself, have a look around. Remember this is public and views are that of the poster. We have no membership cards or entry requirement, no hierarchy except respect for anon contributions (no name means no fame = let the facts speak for themselves) people of varying intents post here, many here to discredit us.

you shall know them by their works (posts)

 

Read the notables, look at the sauce, add moar facts, sources to contribute, you will see the researchers working and how they/we work.

 

If you are truly a journalist you will see things habbening here in a manner that when you were a young aspiring journalist, you hoped your industry would be like. (but is not, imho)

 

Do you believe the MSM is fair and balanced?

Anonymous ID: f6c4a2 June 20, 2020, 6:28 a.m. No.9681190   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>9681101

reviewed legal powers.

>>9680866

could you give your view of the timeline and AP switching story AND the link they had initially to one with a antiDOJ narrative, the original story link now goes to a story done today not the one when originally tweeted (i dont think).

 

here how i see it (please opine)

1- Barr likely with another US Attorney (like Jensen w/Flynn case) reviews and find problems, politically motivated cases, improper predicate, outside influence, etc.

2- Barr has talk with Berman agrees to resign to save face for himself (and DOJ) (or Barr may have just announced 'after' the talk w/Berman giving him an out.

3- Berman upon announcement is influenced by Dems, DS to counter and deny in order to a) underming Barr, Potus while b) Dems/DS negotiate to back off attacks if they are given say in the apoointment of replacement. his tweet basically implies this. c) Barr had already announced replacement and acting Attorney so his tweet confirms the Dems/DS motive.

4) Barr had to fully know this would happen to a degree and is going to respond.

Your post w/PDF outlines legal specific performance, but what about the p.r. and counter narrative?

5) I would think perhaps Barr may disclose moar of the story as to why he was replaced?