Anonymous ID: 23bed2 April 9, 2018, 11:34 a.m. No.969113   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9194

>>968814

>>968837 - (((they))) can't hide behind any Terms of Service - court will force (((them))) to reveal what they did…which is, violate their own ToS which (((they))) never intended to fulfill anyway.

 

Class action lawsuit needs to happen - we could get a huge payout. Indictments are still sealed, arrests forthcoming.

KILL it - no one will ever trust any employee of FB ever again - brand/name ruined.

 

____________

 

FYI - Some previous 'invasion of privacy' LAWSUITS against FB :

 

  • techcrunch.com/2008/03/31/why-were-suing-facebook-for-25-million-in-statutory-damages - use of image/name in third party advertising is a violation of statutory and common law publicity rights

 

  • www.citizen.org/our-work/litigation/cases/fraley-v-facebook - alleging that it was unlawful to use people’s names and photos for advertising without their consent

 

  • topclassactions.com/lawsuit-settlements/lawsuit-news/12606-facebook-faces-class-action-lawsuit-false-like-ads - users' photos were used to advertise products of FB advertisers even though that user never "Like"d the item.

 

  • techcrunch.com/2018/02/19/facebooks-tracking-of-non-users-ruled-illegal-again - FB LOST this lawsuit in Belgium - "the survey reveals that even if you have never entered the Facebook domain, Facebook is still able to follow your browsing behavior without you knowing it, let alone, without you wanting it, thanks to these invisible pixels that Facebook has placed on more than 10,000 other sites.”

 

"Facebook has been using the images of their millions of users, without their knowledge or consent, to sell advertising. Through Facebook’s “Sponsored Stories” program, whenever a user clicks the “Like” button, Facebook may use that interaction to create an advertisement that is then broadcast to that user’s “Friends” on Facebook—turning those users into spokespeople for Facebook advertisers."