Anonymous ID: 78ee24 June 20, 2020, 3:57 p.m. No.9687077   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Our Constitution protects the right of peaceful assembly for redress of grievances, correct?

When that peaceful assembly engages in either destruction to property or violence toward humans, I think we can agree that the assembly is now more properly considered to be a riot.

If that riot then has as an included function the intention of deposing an existing government, can we then agree that it is now an insurrection?

If it then attempts to claim control of a section of the territory of the nation against which it is contending, is it then an invading army and subject to the rules of war?

 

Frankly, if I were in Seattle right now, I'd be doing my best to sneak out of CHAZ / CHOP, as those people have renounced their citizenship and declared themselves to be an autonomous territory within the boundaries of the United States. If i were a resident of the area, I'd be pleading to be rescued by US forces because failing to do so is to be complicit and in agreement with this unlawful seizure of US territory.

The invaders did not ask for their citizenship back nor is it automatically granted. The Geneva Convention does not apply. They do not have any legal right to leave that territory they took by force. They are, by any reasonable definition, enemy combatants.

 

Anyone giving them aid - as little as a kind word or a brown banana thrown over the barrier as if fruit to a zoo animal - is subject to the laws regarding treason for having given aid and comfort to an enemy of the United States.

 

They are so totally fucked. If they EVER get out of this mess, they should look up their old professors and beat the ever living shit out of them.

Anonymous ID: 78ee24 June 20, 2020, 4:10 p.m. No.9687255   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>9687124

Probably, but if I was a cop I'd be asking him to set it on the ground and step back so I could get a good look at it. (bearing in mind that single shot pistols are easy to disguise as phones. )