>>9692934
uh, not understanding point behind
your post.
The first statement,
>There was a very large overflow crowd.<
seems, to me, a refutation of something
stated in my post that would indicate a
contradiction. Meaning, you seem to think I said "there was a small overflow crowd", which, I never said.
And from this statement,
>So obviously, a lot of people didn't get
in who wanted to.<
There seems to be a level of snarkiness
being directed at a fact you believe you
found in my post, which, in fact, does
not exist in that I never said there was
not a lot of people that didn't get in who
wanted to.