Just shut up with that stupidity as I haven't practiced since before I had hair on my sack and couldn't care less about it anyhow. Doesn't change how a person is raised as they can't control that but I truly couldn't care less about any religious shit outside of the bottom line and the bottom line is they have all been corrupted by the same force. When that was, who knows for absolutely sure. Has it remained consistent, doubtful, but it doesn't matter.
I think it's more simplistic. As in, one bridges (connects) to the other. Look at Google for example, better yet Youtube. Look at the options it gives you to interlink your accounts. The same companies Q brought up. Go to any, same options, same companies.
What this tells me is they came together to each control certain aspects of the web (ie: Google/information flow, FB/Twitter pushing information flow/spying on people, etc, etc). They are all connected, they are all bridged together and they all fall work together to achieve the same things which are, in my eyes, pushing of narratives (Marxist), censoring, creating false histories (black Spartans for example), destroying any person/group when needed and funneling monies.
Something I found interesting:
Apr 8 2018 19:50:07 (EST) Q !xowAT4Z3VQ
Bring back the gallows!
8 April 2018
https:// www.cbsnews.com/news/why-60-minutes-aired-photos-of-lynchings-in-report-by-oprah/
Guys make sure you research and look deeply into the firm that you decide to go with for the class action if you decide to do it. Don't just blindly jump in as some are ambulance chasers and shitty where as others are not. Look into them first before you give any information.
Technically the UCMJ would actually be the best route as they were attacking/are attacking the country and thus qualify as enemy combatants. I just have concerns that such things will take awhile as their firms will fight to get it moved to civy courts and thus the clock will run out.
It is why I personally feel a more direct action needs to be taken.
I don't see the reason either unless they are trying to force Iran into response which would then force the US to come to aid their ally given agreements. Maybe they feel they are on a time limit to get Iran out of the way and want to take advantage of the more allied US to them at moment rather than risking another Obama admin? Only conclusion I can draw as it doesn't make sense unless they were attacked, we don't know about it, and they responded. Very odd move, very risky move.
If this is the case, and I believe it is, that means they have dossiers on everyone. Files per say.
Good, CA needs to be brought back into the fold. Way too much importance in CA and it needs to be brought back and the prime movers causing issues within it destroyed.
The next few weeks are going to see an explosion of fraud fucks, shitty firms/ambulance chasers and horribly bad attornies all trying to get peoples attention for the FB lawsuits. Anons, do your research on these things as some of them will undoubtedly be working for FB, taking cases, and will lose on purpose after being paid by FB to do so. Make sure you go with a reputable firm and not one of the ones that have to beg/tell you that you should contact them.
Facebook claims 79 million people had their data taken
Facebook claims they will be notifying everyone with a message today about it.
Not a single person I know has received said message. Has anyone here?
Was it? Okay 87 million then, question still stands though, anyone receive anything? Since there is no way to check I would guarantee they only send it to certain people who their database says won't say or do shit.
Thus the power of all the intel they have gathered. They know who is dangerous to them and will not send them shit.