>>967984

>>967390

>>968259

It's a very big site, Facebook, with a lot of work involved in creating it and much work gone into it by the contributors - which should be their property.

Could it be salvaged?

Also it's not rocket science to build one "For the People"

That way there would be no worry about the proprietary back-doors / software - or the ugly shit it was designed for which could become like a weak memory, rather than something one was reminded of everyday?

Unless it were taken down it would always have visitors. And there is history in it which would perhaps remain?

Since the CIA created it and funded it the archives could become part of our archives, of U.S. of A.? National Archive possession.

We funded it, didn't we?

If and when CIA is dissolved, as a criminal org, it could become USA property?

If FB just gets a civil suit?

What do I get $5 dollars after a hundred-year lawsuit where the lawyers get a fat annuity deducted first?

How would anyone trust the Judges in such a case?

These rats are going to try to pick-up where they left off?

To punish them?

Good question.

At this point most people would be on "Greenberg's" side?

What great PR they have?

>>969604

Well, I'd join a civil suit, no problem - but just don't ask me to pay the lawyer fees.

The first part of the question was

Reform

or

Kill it.

So "Civil Suit" can go on regardless of which of those is chosen.

Far be it from me to block that. I am naturally not in a crowd, that's why I'm here. A billion person civil suit needs a crowd. Tell me when the Civil Suit crowd forms and I'll join.

Everybody should choose their own issues.

Once 9/11 , Boston Firecracker, Tuscon shooting, Batman shooting, Sand Hook et al, get revealed to the public for what they really were - a class action against all these fuckers will be the least of their worries?

>>969959

That was a great speech.

I hope he got some well-deserved rest.