pb >>9693098

Can anons help me understand?

U.S. [in] NZ = No Logs/No Flags/No Records = U.S. Sec Clearance AUTH FVEY VIEW + Doc Take.

relates to Q 1336-

at face value describes how they bypassed constitutional protections to gain intel/spy, at another level Q is giving a peek at how the DS/Cabal intel apparatus controls the Countries. The rabbit hole is this:

1- domestic intel/LE(fbi) follows orders/follows law to a degree, but is given/provided things gained illicitly/non constitutionally, but they act on it and in effect launder it through leaks, fake predicate to be able to use it and hide sources

2- The source of #1 is through FEYE (and other) DS agreements which are sort of legal (if predicated legally), Rarely will this level EVER be exposed. But Q exposed it.

3- Above the recorded and sort of legal #2 is a higher level that is above that agreement (gives order to #2) and does not exist when it comes to any accountability or acknowledgment of its existance to congress or ANY other agency even DNI.

4- #3 is the DS/Cabal secret WW apparatus, how they control countries and presidents completely unconsitutionally, they sanction themselves to operate thats it. even if dismantled it will not be viewed as taking down a secret world govt since there is no public (nor even TS level) knowledge of its existance. The true WW shadow Gov.

Brennan/clowns with BHO, Clapper ok'd used of FEYE agreement (through NZ, etal.) for intel retrieval to bypass laws prohibiting clown agency to conduct domestic Ops.

Some FEYE countries questioned the retrieval/surveil orders and received a confirmation of Op through (domestic paper trail)

diplomatic/intel official channels (likely BHO ok)

Those with proper clearance for this Op gained all the intel (same as nro, nsa and c_a could gather IF legal) and could access/retain hard docs (not just look)

The gist is BHO used full c_a apparatus against domestic targets (citizens) which is illegal, except when initiated by FEYE legally (but it actually was not legal- they tried to hide it, they planted/created a false predicate to initiate FVEY actions) There should be proof because some question it and asked for further confirmation through [F] US channels which was given. They also had (doc take) so received copies which is further evidence.

The actions we think were FBI rogue were actually initiated much higher (clowns+), through SAPs or divisions/secret agencies/well above TS agreements w/[F] intel, in which everything is beyond classified because they in a sense do not exist, are beyond prolly anyone even Barr/Potus looking into them.

At that level they are completely rogue in a sense, and only give their own existance legal sanctions, really nothing can be done legally, it becomes a game of secret force to challenge them. These would be the systems whereby the clowns (or a higher secret agency) controls the President, completely unconstitutional but likely very real.

>>9695082

so i see we are compiling a list of fraudsters obviously!

thanks for volunteering that info to the campaign, sometimes just as important to know who your supporters are as your vocal non-supporters or enemies.

>>9695271

true

easily proven to those that look at the data.

>>9695245

agree, they use FEYE to make the actions of #3 in my post legit, FEYE would follow their orders to make the intel of #3 actionable

#3 would be the non-state groups (NWO/WW Cabal/DS) the true Hidden Enemy rulers.

>>9695340

agree w/you.

Q cited nazi germany to illustrate.

the majority, prolly 80% was destroyed (country hijacked) by the Cabal creating a communist base of far left 10%, and a nazi base far right 10%.

Both were in fact socialists/totalitarian systems, wo the majority middle 80% was truly not the middle, both totalitarian groups nazis and socialists were in fact the same camp ideologically.

The minority totalitarian groups fought it out and either way once the fight ensued the Majority was going to lose the Country they had.

That is what they want here today, and is a TRAP we are not falling into, we stay a the majority. stick together and either let the small minority totalitarians fight each other, or we may have to maintain middle and fight both sides at once.

However THEY were counting on Patriots to form the right wing, so there is no right wing to fight the left, and the left dies a slow death.

Understanding as Q asked how Germany fell is imjportant to repeat falling into the same trap!

>>9695500

>America today is what Germany was

agree.

>Hitler fought the people we are fighting today

disagree that he truly was fighting them, the citizens that joined him thought they were/

agree, that hitler was appearing to fight the people we are today, but was their controlled opposition,

it fell because a destabilization effort was started with a right wing and hitler.

If people would have opposed both communists and nazis and not gone to first civil war, then WW war the enemies would have changed tactics, getting germany to fight was their win.

How do you explain that what started as a civil war led to germanies defeat, the country was lost and yes the newly formed nazi party lost, but that pales in comparison to the silent majority losing the germany that they knew.

Had germany not be tricked into war they prolly could have survived. Allies would then have no reason to conquer germany, they were given reason with nazism.

I am not saying your opinion is not one angle based on some factual history, but it was all designed for that narrative.

>The past seventy years has been a never-ending liberal undermining of all of "our" countries.

yes, replace liberal with socialist and no matter who won nazis or communsim the result today is the same.

>We are on the brink of defeat. Why?

we are not, the minority is given alot of airtime to make the movement seem large, they mobilize protesters all around.

The only way we lose is by starting a civil war against the small minority left, just as germany did.

>Mostly because u and others are not red pilled about WWII.

i am red pilled about the tools the cabal uses and used to destroy germany, it was a trap

>We lost and fought for liberalism

Nazis were liberal socialists, either way once the war started we were going to be fighting for liberalism.

>Roosevelt, Truman and Eisenhower were all liberal commie shitbags.

AND so was supposed other side the Bush nazi connection (read business mans plot to overthrow roosevelt.)

So again either way liberalism won once the german civil war started

>Reconcile.

Communism VS. Socialism (nazis)

Both liberalism, both minority movements, the majority lost

Read Trotsky/Lenin, etc. The goals of socialsim is communism.

Your argument is not considering DS and cabal divide and conquer intel Op tactics.

Once the german civil war started Liberalism WON, the Majority lost Germany and either Socialist or Communists were Guaranteed Victory, both Totalitarian forms of Authoritative Govt.

I am trying to not allow you to Fall into a pre-designed narrative TRAP.

>>9695672

>>9695500

words can be deceiving.

liberalism = willing to change the status quo often in terms of government systems

conservative = desiring to maintain status quo, often politically

poltical status quo now, and back then in germany desired to be maintained by the majority, communsim and nazis were noth liberal in the sense they communism (openly) and nazism (covertly) wanted govt change.

nazism was promoted on conservatism and quickly changed to totalitarian based upon the threat of the left. It was a trick. The communists riled emotions of an intolerant system, the nazis riled the emotions of at first the silent majority to protect the country from change openly promoted by the communist left.

The nazis then DID NOT remain conservative, they became totalitarian and changed germany before the communists could, it accelerated the switch to Socialism (through Liberalism)

The stated enemies of communism is conservativism (in present day republics and old days empires, monarchial and other systems of Gov).

Communism friend and means to the end is Socialism.

Change is effected through Liberalism which is a desire to change from Conservatism.