asking someone is 'ok' with abomination is suggesting it and you , sir , are the abominator.
but your the smartest guy int he room. It's just a rethorica tactic. Right?
you should never have to face the consequences of your twisted sick head narrative, right?
>
I know that but people take you ironically and then they say 'this is what you said' and sometimes they will agree with you and go do what you suggest.
never suggest abomination as an option, is what I suggest, with such affirmative rhetoric in a forum like this because the intentionality of shills will cast you as the one who thought of the horror and they will blame you for it if it gets carried out.
I have an 'are you being served DVD collection where the whole cast does a black face bit ' (this is not a factual account but a humorous tale) and they are banging on my door demanding that I surrender the copy because they found my name on an old list of purchasers. OMG they have pitch forks and they say that want me to do a . . .
OK end of stupid joke.
how unfair of fate to taint a due firing with the idea that 'this guy was fired because' and it's some bogus anarchistic bullshit 'he was in a bad play and made a poor choice at the insistence of his agents and handlers, and to which he objected to do'.
someone is wringing his hands with glee somewhere over this, and Copious Capped angels are keeping tally in the meta space of dream.