>>9697079 (pb)
Ah. So the whole Jew thing is just another brick in their wall of division and another means of slowing down justice.
KEK. I Just realized why the muh joos have been shilling so hard. In fact they even told me yesterday but I missed it.
One of them posted that they were trying to help the newfags. The newfags are their target, which means we are getting lots of new eyes, the world is watching and they are trying to control the narrative and paint us as crazy, "racists," or whatever.
They be skeered.
Argument from ignorance
Argument from ignorance (from Latin: argumentum ad ignorantiam), also known as appeal to ignorance (in which ignorance represents "a lack of contrary evidence"), is a fallacy in informal logic. It asserts that a proposition is true because it has not yet been proven false or a proposition is false because it has not yet been proven true. This represents a type of false dichotomy in that it excludes the possibility that there may have been an insufficient investigation to prove that the proposition is either true or false.[1] It also does not allow for the possibility that the answer is unknowable, only knowable in the future, or neither completely true nor completely false.[2] In debates, appeals to ignorance are sometimes used in an attempt to shift the burden of proof. In research, low-power experiments are subject to false negatives (there would have been an observable effect if there had been a larger sample size or better experimental design) and false positives (there was an observable effect; however, this was a coincidence due purely to random chance, or the events correlate, but there is no cause-effect relationship). The term was likely coined by philosopher John Locke in the late 17th century.[3][4]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_ignorance
Yw.
If I had psychos like you trying to kill every Jew in the world I might consider changing my name too.
So are you saying that Einstein is guilty too because he was a Jew?
Jane you ignorant slut.
I don't like the term liberals when talking about these people because they may be many things but liberal isn't one of them. I prefer the term leftist.
Liberalism
Liberalism is a political and moral philosophy based on liberty, consent of the governed and equality before the law.[1][2][3] Liberals espouse a wide array of views depending on their understanding of these principles, but they generally support free markets, free trade, limited government, individual rights (including civil rights and human rights), capitalism, democracy, secularism, gender equality, racial equality, internationalism, freedom of speech, freedom of the press and freedom of religion.[4][5][6][7][8][9][10] Yellow is the political colour most commonly associated with liberalism.[11][12][13]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberalism
There is nothing liberal about these people unless it comes to being liberal with OTHER peoples money and things.
Well, that is sort of true because the leftists keep changing the definition of words.
KEK. Probably yeah.