idolatry by those who rip down all the other people memorials?
or is it the other way around?
cool
the model shouldn't allow them to have anything to say about content.
they have crossed the line into being a censorship engine.
that whole race bait narrative worked for almost 14 hundred years. they would send in the uneducated sex-cult 'beautowins' to go and take over. They'd have some highborn 'musilm' noble who was a 'crypto' be in charge.
and the landlords and land owners were then either foriegners or the local population of . . . those who we are suppose to never speak about on account of them being so special.
somewhere along the way in the 20th century people figured it out and understand and no long allow the false narratives to go on.
and the reason for 'erasing' hisotyr is that the cyrpto reptile do not want people to remember when they were free, and not overlorded by banks and merchants all of one ethnicity.
>(You)
you say a question with an obviously false premise.
the cryptos ruled the muslim world through their 'sex cult' thug armies, had a religion for them, and a separate religion for themselves, and tried to errase history.
I didn't say anything about that person you mention.
all modern wars are between the crypto-cabalian different branches, some of whom had decided to not play along when the overlords started murdering their cousins (Kaddahhffi)
you enjoy your studies?
how would you even know if this were true, anon.
sounds like wishful thinking by some rather amoral 'studiers'
were they spychologists or 'sex theropists' who did this study.
who granted them the money?
ya, shit like what you say is just off the cuff fake narrative of a blowtard.
you lead into a toilet with your questions.
ignore the truthful reveal if you must.
and try to make it into a gutter discussion.
as if you don't read history yourself.
that is why you feel such shame to try to justify it as 'ethnic' conflict, when it's something very different.
if I broke down the underlying premises of that headline, I would still need to read the article.
the first thing I find is it says Poll.
and then the other one a fake catagory of 'LGBT' which , to me, means discusting assumptions as a gloss to explain some aspect of population for the purposes of polling demographics.
and also who would even take such a poll.
ya, you know, it's Sunday, and you are larping as if you ahve a strong intellect and sauce, but you're just a script.
I suppose one of the reasons we are told to not respond to shills is that they are usually just a conflict script designed to confuse, distract, task master, and boast annoyingly.
there is no one there.
If you start talking about how armies were sent to destroy nations merely based upon the fakeness of a religion that was run by an aristocracy that didn't even believe it . . . and pretended to be but meanwhile were just a power cult . . .
then the scripts will get very very mean and you wil lhave elaborate attempts to get you to stop.
they don't want the history of the last 15 hundred years to be well known and for people to peal off the layers of control. And quickly certain groups and names start popping up. And evidence of the towns they burned down, and the people's lives who they ruined stille exists.
or sometime the lies show it had to be different than what they say. the narrative is fake. the must then mention the name of the prophet and try to get you to talk shit.
but it's then, not some person from 15 hundred years ago, still carrying water for the idea of a war for some concept of fake piety.
how dare I
only a fool labels those people who ran that racket as . . . they have to be seen as also having that group, at least in those regions, also enthralled withina bullshit ethnic facade of further cryptoness.
we can be free of it's influence, and thus hold no ill towards any of the historical people of my narrative. but those contemporaries who don't take my narrative and say 'oh shit, this is close to being what it was, and here i am furthering this bullshit narrative of conquest and kneeling and . . . '
the time for that bullshit is over, and race and ethnic baiting. And that comes with taking the debate forward to 2020.
but they want to bring it back to historical figures because they know that the hypnsosis and 'culture' that they make up (and impose) goes deep and triggers something that they setup in the person to explode.
dip shit cringe perjoritation shilling is IN the bread
you're righting a novella about a war in your mind? you've said it's a civil one?
so polite people can game on it while it goes on, one could imagine. but who would that woudl accusing people of stuff.
and the script of 'quippish bullshit implying riots and horror' as just off the cuff mussings . . .
but again this is just a bullshit script.
why dissect it? talking to it calls a real person over.
another thing: if you do reveals and its truthful stuff, the scripts don't attack you so much after you start saying like I do, out loud, 'this is a script' becuase if they do that is a proof for whatever the reveal is that gets made by the anon.
so they leave you in silence, filter you , ignore you.
but if you put in the word . . . they won't give up and they will attack and hound you all bread.