Anonymous ID: 27e889 June 22, 2020, 8:19 a.m. No.9706711   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6743 >>6784 >>6972 >>7142 >>7275 >>7383

a good read of a 1975 news piece highlighting communist tactics

I do want to highlight #2 a a TRAP they want they would should not fall into.

Q brings up Nazi Germany and I believe he does so to highlight that WW2 was engineered/planned and started with a civil war in Germany.

We are at a precipice similar to Nazi Germany, Nazism was a direct result of leftist/communists aggression.

 

Nazism was to be the solution for the Majority to reclaim normalcy that communists interrupted. It appeared ideologically meritable, but turned out to be a totalitarian scam to gain dictatorial power and create the justification for allies to invade to conquer fascism.

 

Two fingers of the same hand. Communists were openly totalitarian and Nazis were secretly, they used the Right/Left Wing as a tool to divide and conquer and remove the Conservative Majorities Country from them.

 

The Dems/DS/Cabal is relying on a counter insurgency to develop in America to justify a Global conflict by labelling Potus as a Nazi suppresing the people. The Dems represent the left, and China, the UN and even the EU are ready to intercede to defend democracy, that is the narrative. During WW2 thats what the narrative of the allies wa in essence, in reality though were we defending communism and allowing the defeat and destruction of the Conservative Majority, because that seems to be the result, AND is the result [They] want in America.

It is all predicated on a militant response by Potus, and a counter insurgency forming.

That is what Q is telling us to avoid I believe and is why Potus is skillfully passive in intervening, and meanwhile the benefit is we are seeing Dems destroy their cities.

I would surmise that if The Conservative majority in Germany did not support Nazism as a solution and played the long game, supporting strict adherence to consitutional priciples and rule of law (that nazism defied) then eventually they could have defeated communism and avoided being led into a war which effectively allowed commiunists to take over the entire Country of Europe with the Treaty of Roms, EEC and eventually a common currency and the EU.

 

It was all a plan, the solution goal [THEY] wanted was a socialist/totalitarian Europe with one currency, a Government superior to the Nations and they gained it. Within the Hegelian dialect the problem used was Communism who overtly called for destroying the Nation State of Germany, The Reaction and (apparent to the citizens, solution) was Nazism or counter insurgency. Everything went as planned for the Cabal and the EU took control of all the countries of Europe.

 

As a note to show the divide and conquer, in America around that time we had the Bush Nazi faction and the Roosevelt socialist faction, supporting each ideology to fan the flames and ensure the War went according to Plan. Noone in charge ever was held fully accountable for supporting the Nazis even though we declared war on them and each side shared in the spoils of War, as en example the Liberty Oil Ships being divied up.

 

Bringing us to today from Post WW2, we have the same factions of Communists and Nazis with the Clinton and Bush dynasties, switching off Presidencies while they conquer the Conservative Silent Majority.

Thats the Game Folks, they repeat the same tactics over and over.

Anonymous ID: 27e889 June 22, 2020, 9:37 a.m. No.9707212   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>9707079

Yes the scenario for fraud involving China, EU, etal. is real with Paper Ballots.

We need to have an accurate Intel Assessment and prevent this process.

Hopefully avoid corrupt court challenges.

 

Covid19 should not remove our Constitutional Rights of our vote conunting, if there is an increased potential that our votes will not be weighed properly because of even one frauduelent vote, that is too many.

 

The convenience of voting is not a consitutional gurantee, especially when it exposes additional fraud. Presidential elections are very 4 years, similar to renewing a drivers license. Provided voting is not harder than renewing a license I see no problems. Promise all the security and support in the world, but make people show up, check id and ensure the integrity of each vote, the Government has an obligation to do so, changing the status quo to increase the chance that even one fraudulent vote occurs is a Constitutional crime (color of law?) against a legal voter.

 

The convenience test is new, precedent and history have etablished the norms, the new arguments should not supercede the historical precedence especially when fraud is increased statistically.